2023Al-Azhar Journal of DentistryRequires access

Remineralization Effect of Two Types of Varnishes on Induced Enamel Caries

Abeer Tageldin, Magda El-Malt, Sara N. Hashem

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Purpose: to assess the remineralization capacity of MI varnish and Bifluorid 10 varnish on induced white spot lesions in deciduous enamel, using Scanning Electron Microscope- Energy Dispersive X-ray. Materials and methods: Sixty human caries-free deciduous teeth were collected. The teeth were stored in 0.1% thymol solution. A 4*4*2 window was created on the buccal surface of each tooth using acid-resistant nail varnish. Samples were then divided into 3 groups according to the remineralizing agent used, each group containing 20 teeth. Group I was remineralized with MI varnish, group II was remineralized using Bifluorid 10 varnish, while group III was a control group that didn’t receive any remineralization. Then, baseline assessment of Calcium/Phosphorous (% weight) was done using SEM-EDX. Teeth were then immersed in a demineralizing solution at 37°C for 72 hours, until white spot lesions in enamel were visible. SEM-EDX assessment was carried out for the demineralized samples. Remineralization using MI varnish and Bifluorid 10 varnish was done in groups I and II respectively. SEM-EDX assessment was carried out to evaluate the remineralization capacity of each varnish. Results: SEM-EDX examination showed that MI varnish had the highest remineralization capacity. The examination showed statistically significant difference between group I and II. They are both superior to the control group. Conclusion: Both MI varnish and Bifluorid 10 varnish had acceptable remineralization capacity. MI varnsih is preferred.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: to assess the remineralization capacity of MI varnish and Bifluorid 10 varnish on induced white spot lesions in deciduous enamel, using Scanning Electron Microscope- Energy Dispersive X-ray. Materials and methods: Sixty human caries-free deciduous teeth were collected. The teeth were stored in 0.1% thymol solution. A 4*4*2 window was created on the buccal surface of each tooth using acid-resistant nail varnish. Samples were then divided into 3 groups according to the remineralizing agent used, each group containing 20 teeth. Group I was remineralized with MI varnish, group II was remineralized using Bifluorid 10 varnish, while group III was a control group that didn’t receive any remineralization. Then, baseline assessment of Calcium/Phosphorous (% weight) was done using SEM-EDX. Teeth were then immersed in a demineralizing solution at 37°C for 72 hours, until white spot lesions in enamel were visible. SEM-EDX assessment was carried out for the demineralized samples. Remineralization using MI varnish and Bifluorid 10 varnish was done in groups I and II respectively. SEM-EDX assessment was carried out to evaluate the remineralization capacity of each varnish. Results: SEM-EDX examination showed that MI varnish had the highest remineralization capacity. The examination showed statistically significant difference between group I and II. They are both superior to the control group. Conclusion: Both MI varnish and Bifluorid 10 varnish had acceptable remineralization capacity. MI varnsih is preferred.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: to assess the remineralization capacity of MI varnish and Bifluorid 10 varnish on induced white spot lesions in deciduous enamel, using Scanning Electron Microscope- Energy Dispersive X-ray. Materials and methods: Sixty human caries-free deciduous teeth were collected. The teeth were stored in 0.1% thymol solution. A 4*4*2 window was created on the buccal surface of each tooth using acid-resistant nail varnish. Samples were then divided into 3 groups according to the remineralizing agent used, each group containing 20 teeth. Group I was remineralized with MI varnish, group II was remineralized using Bifluorid 10 varnish, while group III was a control group that didn’t receive any remineralization. Then, baseline assessment of Calcium/Phosphorous (% weight) was done using SEM-EDX. Teeth were then immersed in a demineralizing solution at 37°C for 72 hours, until white spot lesions in enamel were visible. SEM-EDX assessment was carried out for the demineralized samples. Remineralization using MI varnish and Bifluorid 10 varnish was done in groups I and II respectively. SEM-EDX assessment was carried out to evaluate the remineralization capacity of each varnish. Results: SEM-EDX examination showed that MI varnish had the highest remineralization capacity. The examination showed statistically significant difference between group I and II. They are both superior to the control group. Conclusion: Both MI varnish and Bifluorid 10 varnish had acceptable remineralization capacity. MI varnsih is preferred.

Key concepts: Varnish, Remineralisation, Dentistry, Enamel paint, Fluoride varnish, Tooth Remineralization, Demineralization, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Remineralization Effect of Two Types of Varnishes on Induced Enamel Caries — Research Paper | ScholarLens