2009Scientiae mathematicae JaponicaeRequires access

A NOTE ON THE MARTIN TOPOLOGY OF THE SPACE OF THE FORMAL BALLS

Hikari Hashiriura

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Let (X,d) a metric space and BX = X × denote the partially ordered set of generalized formal balls in X. We investigate the relations between the Martin topology and the product topology of certain topologies of X and the Sorgenfrey line. We give a condition that the Martin topology coincides with the product topology of a metric topology and the Sorgenfrey topology, and consider on the conditions that the Martin topology is homeomorphic to the product topology of a metric topology and the Sorgenfrey topology. We also show that the space of formal balls on with the Martin topology is homeomorphic to the square of the Sorgenfrey lines. 1 Introduction Basic tools of topological approaches to domain theory are functions such as a qausi-metric and a (weak) partial metric. The Scott topology and the Lawson topology are known as the fundamental topologies related to the order structures in posets. Several authors investigated the relations between order structures, metric-like functions above, the Scott topology and the Lawson topology (cf. (4)). K. Martin (7) introduced a notion of a measurement in a domain to describe a quanti- tative statements on programs, and P. Waszkiewicz (10) discussed on the relations between the measurements and the partial metrics due to S. G. Matthews (8) on continuous posets. K. Martin also showed that every measurement induces a topology that we call the Martin topology. It is shown that the Martin topology has a clopen base, and it is stronger than the Lawson topology. However, a few facts are known about the Martin topology. Let (X, d) be a metric space. Then, an element of B + X = X ×(0, +∞) is called a formal ball. We induce a partial orderon B + X as (x, r) � (y, s )i fd(x, y) ≤ r − s. The notion of formal balls is introduced by Weihrauch and Schreiber to represent a metric space in a domain as a computational model (11). Several authors sudied the poset of formal balls as an approximating structure of a metric space (1, 2, 5, 6). Recently, Tsuiki-Hattori (9) introduced formal balls with negative radiuses and study the partially ordered set BX = X × R with an order relation which is similar to B + X. An element of BX is called a generalized formal ball. The sets BX obviously has the Lawson topology as a poset. It is easy to see that the relative Lawson topology on every slice X ×{ t }⊂ BX (t ∈ R) is homeomorphic to the metric topology of X and every slice {x }× R ⊂ BX (x ∈ X) is homeomorphic to the usual real line R. In this direction, Tsuiki- Hattori considered the differences, or coincidences of the Lawson topology and the product topology of X and R on BX. The Martin topology on the space of formal balls seems to be more complicated, because the relative Martin topology on every slice X ×{ t }⊂ BX (t ∈ R) is a discrete space, which is not homeomorphic to the metric topology of X in general, and every slice {x }× R ⊂ BX (x ∈ X) is homeomorphic to the Sorgenfrey line. In the present note, we will consider

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Let (X,d) a metric space and BX = X × denote the partially ordered set of generalized formal balls in X. We investigate the relations between the Martin topology and the product topology of certain topologies of X and the Sorgenfrey line. We give a condition that the Martin topology coincides with the product topology of a metric topology and the Sorgenfrey topology, and consider on the conditions that the Martin topology is homeomorphic to the product topology of a metric topology and the Sorgenfrey topology. We also show that the space of formal balls on with the Martin topology is homeomorphic to the square of the Sorgenfrey lines. 1 Introduction Basic tools of topological approaches to domain theory are functions such as a qausi-metric and a (weak) partial metric. The Scott topology and the Lawson topology are known as the fundamental topologies related to the order structures in posets. Several authors investigated the relations between order structures, metric-like functions above, the Scott topology and the Lawson topology (cf. (4)). K. Martin (7) introduced a notion of a measurement in a domain to describe a quanti- tative statements on programs, and P. Waszkiewicz (10) discussed on the relations between the measurements and the partial metrics due to S. G. Matthews (8) on continuous posets. K. Martin also showed that every measurement induces a topology that we call the Martin topology. It is shown that the Martin topology has a clopen base, and it is stronger than the Lawson topology. However, a few facts are known about the Martin topology. Let (X, d) be a metric space. Then, an element of B + X = X ×(0, +∞) is called a formal ball. We induce a partial orderon B + X as (x, r) � (y, s )i fd(x, y) ≤ r − s. The notion of formal balls is introduced by Weihrauch and Schreiber to represent a metric space in a domain as a computational model (11). Several authors sudied the poset of formal balls as an approximating structure of a metric space (1, 2, 5, 6). Recently, Tsuiki-Hattori (9) introduced formal balls with negative radiuses and study the partially ordered set BX = X × R with an order relation which is similar to B + X. An element of BX is called a generalized formal ball. The sets BX obviously has the Lawson topology as a poset. It is easy to see that the relative Lawson topology on every slice X ×{ t }⊂ BX (t ∈ R) is homeomorphic to the metric topology of X and every slice {x }× R ⊂ BX (x ∈ X) is homeomorphic to the usual real line R. In this direction, Tsuiki- Hattori considered the differences, or coincidences of the Lawson topology and the product topology of X and R on BX. The Martin topology on the space of formal balls seems to be more complicated, because the relative Martin topology on every slice X ×{ t }⊂ BX (t ∈ R) is a discrete space, which is not homeomorphic to the metric topology of X in general, and every slice {x }× R ⊂ BX (x ∈ X) is homeomorphic to the Sorgenfrey line. In the present note, we will consider

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Let (X,d) a metric space and BX = X × denote the partially ordered set of generalized formal balls in X. We investigate the relations between the Martin topology and the product topology of certain topologies of X and the Sorgenfrey line. We give a condition that the Martin topology coincides with the product topology of a metric topology and the Sorgenfrey topology, and consider on the conditions that the Martin topology is homeomorphic to the product topology of a metric topology and the Sorgenfrey topology. We also show that the space of formal balls on with the Martin topology is homeomorphic to the square of the Sorgenfrey lines. 1 Introduction Basic tools of topological approaches to domain theory are functions such as a qausi-metric and a (weak) partial metric. The Scott topology and the Lawson topology are known as the fundamental topologies related to the order structures in posets. Several authors investigated the relations between order structures, metric-like functions above, the Scott topology and the Lawson topology (cf. (4)). K. Martin (7) introduced a notion of a measurement in a domain to describe a quanti- tative statements on programs, and P. Waszkiewicz (10) discussed on the relations between the measurements and the partial metrics due to S. G. Matthews (8) on continuous posets. K. Martin also showed that every measurement induces a topology that we call the Martin topology. It is shown that the Martin topology has a clopen base, and it is stronger than the Lawson topology. However, a few facts are known about the Martin topology. Let (X, d) be a metric space. Then, an element of B + X = X ×(0, +∞) is called a formal ball. We induce a partial orderon B + X as (x, r) � (y, s )i fd(x, y) ≤ r − s. The notion of formal balls is introduced by Weihrauch and Schreiber to represent a metric space in a domain as a computational model (11). Several authors sudied the poset of formal balls as an approximating structure of a metric space (1, 2, 5, 6). Recently, Tsuiki-Hattori (9) introduced formal balls with negative radiuses and study the partially ordered set BX = X × R with an order relation which is similar to B + X. An element of BX is called a generalized formal ball. The sets BX obviously has the Lawson topology as a poset. It is easy to see that the relative Lawson topology on every slice X ×{ t }⊂ BX (t ∈ R) is homeomorphic to the metric topology of X and every slice {x }× R ⊂ BX (x ∈ X) is homeomorphic to the usual real line R. In this direction, Tsuiki- Hattori considered the differences, or coincidences of the Lawson topology and the product topology of X and R on BX. The Martin topology on the space of formal balls seems to be more complicated, because the relative Martin topology on every slice X ×{ t }⊂ BX (t ∈ R) is a discrete space, which is not homeomorphic to the metric topology of X in general, and every slice {x }× R ⊂ BX (x ∈ X) is homeomorphic to the Sorgenfrey line. In the present note, we will consider

Key concepts: Product topology, Topology (electrical circuits), Initial topology, General topology, Extension topology, Weak topology (polar topology), Subbase, Comparison of topologies

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A NOTE ON THE MARTIN TOPOLOGY OF THE SPACE OF THE FORMAL BALLS — Research Paper | ScholarLens