2006Unpublished venueRequires access

The Gumley Charter of 749

Alan Cooper

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The charter may be found as B178 (S92, MS 2). W. H. Stevenson considers this text suspicious because of the use of same proem and anathema in a suspicious Abingdon charter (B891; S583) copied in house's twelfth-century cartulary; however, the logic of the situation would dictate that the Abingdon charter was copied from the Gumley charter, which was avaliable to William of Malmesbury (who quoted it without the anathema in his Gesta regum ) and therefore was probably also available to the Abingdon chronicler. The oddities of the contents of the charter, discussed in Chapter 1, also suggest its genuineness, as they were so troubling to twelfth-century writers that they tended to correct them by their own standards – no forger would create such a document. The text of the main body of the charter is as follows: There are fourteen subscriptions, including Æthelbald, two bishops (Huita, ‘humble Bishop of the Mercian Church’, i.e., of Lichfield, and Bishop Torthelm of Leicester) and eleven laymen.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The charter may be found as B178 (S92, MS 2). W. H. Stevenson considers this text suspicious because of the use of same proem and anathema in a suspicious Abingdon charter (B891; S583) copied in house's twelfth-century cartulary; however, the logic of the situation would dictate that the Abingdon charter was copied from the Gumley charter, which was avaliable to William of Malmesbury (who quoted it without the anathema in his Gesta regum ) and therefore was probably also available to the Abingdon chronicler. The oddities of the contents of the charter, discussed in Chapter 1, also suggest its genuineness, as they were so troubling to twelfth-century writers that they tended to correct them by their own standards – no forger would create such a document. The text of the main body of the charter is as follows: There are fourteen subscriptions, including Æthelbald, two bishops (Huita, ‘humble Bishop of the Mercian Church’, i.e., of Lichfield, and Bishop Torthelm of Leicester) and eleven laymen.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The charter may be found as B178 (S92, MS 2). W. H. Stevenson considers this text suspicious because of the use of same proem and anathema in a suspicious Abingdon charter (B891; S583) copied in house's twelfth-century cartulary; however, the logic of the situation would dictate that the Abingdon charter was copied from the Gumley charter, which was avaliable to William of Malmesbury (who quoted it without the anathema in his Gesta regum ) and therefore was probably also available to the Abingdon chronicler. The oddities of the contents of the charter, discussed in Chapter 1, also suggest its genuineness, as they were so troubling to twelfth-century writers that they tended to correct them by their own standards – no forger would create such a document. The text of the main body of the charter is as follows: There are fourteen subscriptions, including Æthelbald, two bishops (Huita, ‘humble Bishop of the Mercian Church’, i.e., of Lichfield, and Bishop Torthelm of Leicester) and eleven laymen.

Key concepts: Charter, Law, History, Political science, Art, Literature, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Gumley Charter of 749 — Research Paper | ScholarLens