2023•Psychology Crime and LawRequires access

Exploring the linkage between changes in detainees’ perceptions of procedural justice and changes in misconduct

Matthias van Hall, Anja Dirkzwager, P.H. van der Laan, Paul Nieuwbeerta

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

A growing body of research has studied the role of procedural justice for securing compliant behavior in the correctional context. The purpose of this paper is to advance current knowledge by examining (a) whether detainees change their perceptions of prison staff procedural justice over time, and (b) the extent to which individual changes in procedural justice relate to changes in misconduct. We used longitudinal data on 712 adults who entered Dutch pre-trial detention centers. Reliable change index scores were used to identify changes in procedural justice experienced in contacts with prison staff. Logistic regression models were employed to estimate the effects of changes in procedural justice on changes in misconduct. The results show that detainees’ perceptions of fairness are malleable, and that most detainees (52.2%) experience a decrease in procedural justice during imprisonment. Detainees reporting an increase in procedural justice are less likely to show increases in misconduct. Furthermore, those with high procedural justice perceptions at both times are more likely to abstain from misconduct at both times. More research is needed to improve our knowledge on individual changes in procedural justice and changes in actual behavior.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A growing body of research has studied the role of procedural justice for securing compliant behavior in the correctional context. The purpose of this paper is to advance current knowledge by examining (a) whether detainees change their perceptions of prison staff procedural justice over time, and (b) the extent to which individual changes in procedural justice relate to changes in misconduct. We used longitudinal data on 712 adults who entered Dutch pre-trial detention centers. Reliable change index scores were used to identify changes in procedural justice experienced in contacts with prison staff. Logistic regression models were employed to estimate the effects of changes in procedural justice on changes in misconduct. The results show that detainees’ perceptions of fairness are malleable, and that most detainees (52.2%) experience a decrease in procedural justice during imprisonment. Detainees reporting an increase in procedural justice are less likely to show increases in misconduct. Furthermore, those with high procedural justice perceptions at both times are more likely to abstain from misconduct at both times. More research is needed to improve our knowledge on individual changes in procedural justice and changes in actual behavior.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A growing body of research has studied the role of procedural justice for securing compliant behavior in the correctional context. The purpose of this paper is to advance current knowledge by examining (a) whether detainees change their perceptions of prison staff procedural justice over time, and (b) the extent to which individual changes in procedural justice relate to changes in misconduct. We used longitudinal data on 712 adults who entered Dutch pre-trial detention centers. Reliable change index scores were used to identify changes in procedural justice experienced in contacts with prison staff. Logistic regression models were employed to estimate the effects of changes in procedural justice on changes in misconduct. The results show that detainees’ perceptions of fairness are malleable, and that most detainees (52.2%) experience a decrease in procedural justice during imprisonment. Detainees reporting an increase in procedural justice are less likely to show increases in misconduct. Furthermore, those with high procedural justice perceptions at both times are more likely to abstain from misconduct at both times. More research is needed to improve our knowledge on individual changes in procedural justice and changes in actual behavior.

Key concepts: Procedural justice, Misconduct, Prison, Context (archaeology), Psychology, Economic Justice, Perception, Criminal justice

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Exploring the linkage between changes in detainees’ perceptions of procedural justice and changes in misconduct — Research Paper | ScholarLens