Ideal Theory: What It Was
David Schmidtz
Abstract
David Schmidtz
Abstract
Abstract Philosophers and political theorists recently have had a common project: to reflect on the merits of realism and idealism in political theory. No one opposes being realistic or idealistic per se. The serious question is, what would make one attempt to articulate ideals better than another? Let’s say realism studies the human condition as it is, while idealism studies the human condition as it could be. Thus described, realism and idealism are compatible. No one objects to studying the human condition—as it is or as it could be. What divides scholars is not whether to theorize about ideals, but how to do it competently.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Philosophers and political theorists recently have had a common project: to reflect on the merits of realism and idealism in political theory. No one opposes being realistic or idealistic per se. The serious question is, what would make one attempt to articulate ideals better than another? Let’s say realism studies the human condition as it is, while idealism studies the human condition as it could be. Thus described, realism and idealism are compatible. No one objects to studying the human condition—as it is or as it could be. What divides scholars is not whether to theorize about ideals, but how to do it competently.
Key concepts: Idealism, Realism, Ideal (ethics), Epistemology, Philosophy, Politics, Philosophical realism, Political science