2023Unpublished venueRequires access

Ideal Theory: What It Was

David Schmidtz

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Philosophers and political theorists recently have had a common project: to reflect on the merits of realism and idealism in political theory. No one opposes being realistic or idealistic per se. The serious question is, what would make one attempt to articulate ideals better than another? Let’s say realism studies the human condition as it is, while idealism studies the human condition as it could be. Thus described, realism and idealism are compatible. No one objects to studying the human condition—as it is or as it could be. What divides scholars is not whether to theorize about ideals, but how to do it competently.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Philosophers and political theorists recently have had a common project: to reflect on the merits of realism and idealism in political theory. No one opposes being realistic or idealistic per se. The serious question is, what would make one attempt to articulate ideals better than another? Let’s say realism studies the human condition as it is, while idealism studies the human condition as it could be. Thus described, realism and idealism are compatible. No one objects to studying the human condition—as it is or as it could be. What divides scholars is not whether to theorize about ideals, but how to do it competently.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Philosophers and political theorists recently have had a common project: to reflect on the merits of realism and idealism in political theory. No one opposes being realistic or idealistic per se. The serious question is, what would make one attempt to articulate ideals better than another? Let’s say realism studies the human condition as it is, while idealism studies the human condition as it could be. Thus described, realism and idealism are compatible. No one objects to studying the human condition—as it is or as it could be. What divides scholars is not whether to theorize about ideals, but how to do it competently.

Key concepts: Idealism, Realism, Ideal (ethics), Epistemology, Philosophy, Politics, Philosophical realism, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ideal Theory: What It Was — Research Paper | ScholarLens