2023•Unpublished venueRequires access

Phenomenal Knowledge without Experience

Torin Alter

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract This chapter defends the premise that Mary gains knowledge when released from the black-and-white room from an objection presented by Dennett and Mandik. They argue that the intuition driving that premise derives from the mistaken assumption that knowing what it is like to see in color requires having color experiences. But that intuition does not derive from that assumption. To suppose it does is to miss the key role of a priori deducibility in the knowledge argument. The epistemic gap has the form one cannot learn Q in way Wd (viz., by deduction from physical information), not the only way to learn Q is in way We (viz., by having relevant experiences).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This chapter defends the premise that Mary gains knowledge when released from the black-and-white room from an objection presented by Dennett and Mandik. They argue that the intuition driving that premise derives from the mistaken assumption that knowing what it is like to see in color requires having color experiences. But that intuition does not derive from that assumption. To suppose it does is to miss the key role of a priori deducibility in the knowledge argument. The epistemic gap has the form one cannot learn Q in way Wd (viz., by deduction from physical information), not the only way to learn Q is in way We (viz., by having relevant experiences).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This chapter defends the premise that Mary gains knowledge when released from the black-and-white room from an objection presented by Dennett and Mandik. They argue that the intuition driving that premise derives from the mistaken assumption that knowing what it is like to see in color requires having color experiences. But that intuition does not derive from that assumption. To suppose it does is to miss the key role of a priori deducibility in the knowledge argument. The epistemic gap has the form one cannot learn Q in way Wd (viz., by deduction from physical information), not the only way to learn Q is in way We (viz., by having relevant experiences).

Key concepts: Premise, Intuition, Epistemology, A priori and a posteriori, Argument (complex analysis), Philosophy, Psychology, Biochemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Phenomenal Knowledge without Experience — Research Paper | ScholarLens