1995Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

QUALITY MANAGEMENT OF HMA CONSTRUCTION USING SUPERPAVE EQUIPMENT: A CASE STUDY

R M Anderson, Robert D Bosley, Philip A Creamer

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

This report describes the results of a case study to evaluate the quality management of asphalt mixtures using equipment developed as part of the Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP). The final product of SHRP was a collection of products known as Superpave (Trademark) (SUperior PERforming asphalt PAVEments). SHRP research involved the development of the Superpave system. While much asphalt mixtures work was performed in the laboratory, very little had been attempted in practice. This case study focused on the testing and field quality control of an intermediate course mixture on an interstate highway in Lexington, Kentucky. Specifically, a field sampling and testing plan was initialized to examine the sensitivity of the Superpave Gyratory Compactor (SGC) to changes in materials components. In addition to evaluating the SGC, Marshall specimens were produced and analyzed. In this manner, both compaction techniques were directly compared. Test results indicated that the SGC procedure is highly sensitive to changes in materials components, particularly asphalt content and dust content. In addition, the SGC procedure resulted in specimens with reduced variability within a set. The testing time was not significantly increased using the SGC procedure compared to the Marshall procedure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This report describes the results of a case study to evaluate the quality management of asphalt mixtures using equipment developed as part of the Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP). The final product of SHRP was a collection of products known as Superpave (Trademark) (SUperior PERforming asphalt PAVEments). SHRP research involved the development of the Superpave system. While much asphalt mixtures work was performed in the laboratory, very little had been attempted in practice. This case study focused on the testing and field quality control of an intermediate course mixture on an interstate highway in Lexington, Kentucky. Specifically, a field sampling and testing plan was initialized to examine the sensitivity of the Superpave Gyratory Compactor (SGC) to changes in materials components. In addition to evaluating the SGC, Marshall specimens were produced and analyzed. In this manner, both compaction techniques were directly compared. Test results indicated that the SGC procedure is highly sensitive to changes in materials components, particularly asphalt content and dust content. In addition, the SGC procedure resulted in specimens with reduced variability within a set. The testing time was not significantly increased using the SGC procedure compared to the Marshall procedure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This report describes the results of a case study to evaluate the quality management of asphalt mixtures using equipment developed as part of the Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP). The final product of SHRP was a collection of products known as Superpave (Trademark) (SUperior PERforming asphalt PAVEments). SHRP research involved the development of the Superpave system. While much asphalt mixtures work was performed in the laboratory, very little had been attempted in practice. This case study focused on the testing and field quality control of an intermediate course mixture on an interstate highway in Lexington, Kentucky. Specifically, a field sampling and testing plan was initialized to examine the sensitivity of the Superpave Gyratory Compactor (SGC) to changes in materials components. In addition to evaluating the SGC, Marshall specimens were produced and analyzed. In this manner, both compaction techniques were directly compared. Test results indicated that the SGC procedure is highly sensitive to changes in materials components, particularly asphalt content and dust content. In addition, the SGC procedure resulted in specimens with reduced variability within a set. The testing time was not significantly increased using the SGC procedure compared to the Marshall procedure.

Key concepts: Asphalt, Engineering, Compaction, Asphalt pavement, Quality (philosophy), Civil engineering, Forensic engineering, Transport engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
QUALITY MANAGEMENT OF HMA CONSTRUCTION USING SUPERPAVE EQUIPMENT: A CASE STUDY — Research Paper | ScholarLens