2022Unpublished venueRequires access

Experimental and Numerical Study of Basic Discharge Coefficient (Cd) For Orifice Plate Meters Under Single Phase Fluid Flow

M.R. Ridlah

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Orifice meter’s accuracy is of great importance in fluid flow metering due to the monetary value of fluid transferred daily. The discharge coefficient of the orifice meter calculate for the irreversible losses in the system, which requires extensive experimental validation in accordance with the API standard. This paper presents the numerical simulation study as an alternative of experimental works for estimating the orifice plate’s discharge coefficient. In this study, numerical simulations performed under several orifice diameters with single-phase gas flow with multiple gas flow rates. Two different Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes turbulent models, i.e., SST k-ω and Realizable k-ℇ model, are employed to solve the upstream and downstream orifice differential pressure, based on which the corresponding discharge coefficient is generated. Experimental data points are employed to validate the numerical study, and its comparison studied statistically. Simulations of two orifices display in this study, i.e., 1-inch orifice with SST k-ω and 1.5-inch orifice with Realizable k-e turbulence model. It observed that the pressure increases slightly as the fluid approaches the orifice, and the pressure drops suddenly and continues to drop until it reaches the vena contracta. Moreover, due to the increased velocity of the gas passing through the reduced area of the orifice, the pressure gradually increases afterward. Compared with the experimental data, the numerical simulation under-predicts the discharge coefficient. However, the data discrepancy is less than 4% and 6% respectively. The pressure at 12-inch downstream of the orifice is obtained to investigate the pressure loss ratio. The pressure loss ratio is slightly over-predicted by the numerical simulation of 2% and 6% relative error respectively. Furthermore, user-defined functions that consider the effect of the turbulence model can be developed based on the contribution of this study to expand the numerical

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Orifice meter’s accuracy is of great importance in fluid flow metering due to the monetary value of fluid transferred daily. The discharge coefficient of the orifice meter calculate for the irreversible losses in the system, which requires extensive experimental validation in accordance with the API standard. This paper presents the numerical simulation study as an alternative of experimental works for estimating the orifice plate’s discharge coefficient. In this study, numerical simulations performed under several orifice diameters with single-phase gas flow with multiple gas flow rates. Two different Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes turbulent models, i.e., SST k-ω and Realizable k-ℇ model, are employed to solve the upstream and downstream orifice differential pressure, based on which the corresponding discharge coefficient is generated. Experimental data points are employed to validate the numerical study, and its comparison studied statistically. Simulations of two orifices display in this study, i.e., 1-inch orifice with SST k-ω and 1.5-inch orifice with Realizable k-e turbulence model. It observed that the pressure increases slightly as the fluid approaches the orifice, and the pressure drops suddenly and continues to drop until it reaches the vena contracta. Moreover, due to the increased velocity of the gas passing through the reduced area of the orifice, the pressure gradually increases afterward. Compared with the experimental data, the numerical simulation under-predicts the discharge coefficient. However, the data discrepancy is less than 4% and 6% respectively. The pressure at 12-inch downstream of the orifice is obtained to investigate the pressure loss ratio. The pressure loss ratio is slightly over-predicted by the numerical simulation of 2% and 6% relative error respectively. Furthermore, user-defined functions that consider the effect of the turbulence model can be developed based on the contribution of this study to expand the numerical

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Orifice meter’s accuracy is of great importance in fluid flow metering due to the monetary value of fluid transferred daily. The discharge coefficient of the orifice meter calculate for the irreversible losses in the system, which requires extensive experimental validation in accordance with the API standard. This paper presents the numerical simulation study as an alternative of experimental works for estimating the orifice plate’s discharge coefficient. In this study, numerical simulations performed under several orifice diameters with single-phase gas flow with multiple gas flow rates. Two different Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes turbulent models, i.e., SST k-ω and Realizable k-ℇ model, are employed to solve the upstream and downstream orifice differential pressure, based on which the corresponding discharge coefficient is generated. Experimental data points are employed to validate the numerical study, and its comparison studied statistically. Simulations of two orifices display in this study, i.e., 1-inch orifice with SST k-ω and 1.5-inch orifice with Realizable k-e turbulence model. It observed that the pressure increases slightly as the fluid approaches the orifice, and the pressure drops suddenly and continues to drop until it reaches the vena contracta. Moreover, due to the increased velocity of the gas passing through the reduced area of the orifice, the pressure gradually increases afterward. Compared with the experimental data, the numerical simulation under-predicts the discharge coefficient. However, the data discrepancy is less than 4% and 6% respectively. The pressure at 12-inch downstream of the orifice is obtained to investigate the pressure loss ratio. The pressure loss ratio is slightly over-predicted by the numerical simulation of 2% and 6% relative error respectively. Furthermore, user-defined functions that consider the effect of the turbulence model can be developed based on the contribution of this study to expand the numerical

Key concepts: Body orifice, Discharge coefficient, Orifice plate, Flow coefficient, Mechanics, Pressure drop, Turbulence, Reynolds number

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Experimental and Numerical Study of Basic Discharge Coefficient (Cd) For Orifice Plate Meters Under Single Phase Fluid Flow — Research Paper | ScholarLens