ScholarLens Back to search
2023•International Journal of Respiratory and Pulmonary MedicineOpen access

Effectiveness of Prone Positioning versus Supine Positioning in Patients Suffering from Refractory ARDS: A Meta-Analysis

Wright James A

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Prone positioning (PP) was advocated more than 40 years ago as a means of improving the oxygenation status in patients exhibiting acute respiratory failure (ARF) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Prone positioning (PP) was advocated more than 40 years ago as a means of improving the oxygenation status in patients exhibiting acute respiratory failure (ARF) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Prone positioning (PP) was advocated more than 40 years ago as a means of improving the oxygenation status in patients exhibiting acute respiratory failure (ARF) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Key concepts: ARDS, Prone position, Supine position, Acute respiratory distress, Medicine, Meta-analysis, Refractory (planetary science), Intensive care medicine

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effectiveness of Prone Positioning versus Supine Positioning in Patients Suffering from Refractory ARDS: A Meta-Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens