2000American Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsOpen access

Alleviating Tall Fescue Toxicosis Problems with Nontoxic Endophytes

Larry Hawkins, J. H. Bouton, Nick Hill, C. S. Hoveland, Mark McCann, Fred Thompson

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In 1943, a cultivar of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) later known as Kentucky 312 was released for sale. This cool season grass became widely distributed in the southeastern United States because it was persistent in the face of drought, grew on poor soils and provided good erosion control, as well as large amounts of forage for hay or grazing.2 By 1950, it was recognized that animals grazing tall fescue did not perform as well as forage analysis would predict.2 In 1977, research (Bacon) revealed the presence of an endophyte, Neotyphodium coenophialum, in the intercellular spaces of the leaf sheath. Later research connected this endophyte with what is now recognized as fescue toxicosis.4,5 With the discovery of the endophyte in tall fescue, the solution to the toxicity problem became obvious: remove the endophyte.1 With endophyte-free fescue, animal performance improved but the plants were not as hardy, and stand loss in endophyte-free fescue became a problem.3

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 1943, a cultivar of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) later known as Kentucky 312 was released for sale. This cool season grass became widely distributed in the southeastern United States because it was persistent in the face of drought, grew on poor soils and provided good erosion control, as well as large amounts of forage for hay or grazing.2 By 1950, it was recognized that animals grazing tall fescue did not perform as well as forage analysis would predict.2 In 1977, research (Bacon) revealed the presence of an endophyte, Neotyphodium coenophialum, in the intercellular spaces of the leaf sheath. Later research connected this endophyte with what is now recognized as fescue toxicosis.4,5 With the discovery of the endophyte in tall fescue, the solution to the toxicity problem became obvious: remove the endophyte.1 With endophyte-free fescue, animal performance improved but the plants were not as hardy, and stand loss in endophyte-free fescue became a problem.3

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 1943, a cultivar of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) later known as Kentucky 312 was released for sale. This cool season grass became widely distributed in the southeastern United States because it was persistent in the face of drought, grew on poor soils and provided good erosion control, as well as large amounts of forage for hay or grazing.2 By 1950, it was recognized that animals grazing tall fescue did not perform as well as forage analysis would predict.2 In 1977, research (Bacon) revealed the presence of an endophyte, Neotyphodium coenophialum, in the intercellular spaces of the leaf sheath. Later research connected this endophyte with what is now recognized as fescue toxicosis.4,5 With the discovery of the endophyte in tall fescue, the solution to the toxicity problem became obvious: remove the endophyte.1 With endophyte-free fescue, animal performance improved but the plants were not as hardy, and stand loss in endophyte-free fescue became a problem.3

Key concepts: Endophyte, Neotyphodium, Festuca arundinacea, Grazing, Forage, Biology, Agronomy, Cultivar

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Alleviating Tall Fescue Toxicosis Problems with Nontoxic Endophytes — Research Paper | ScholarLens