2023Journal of Plankton ResearchRequires access

Does the predatory rotiferAsplanchnainduce a behavioral response in the prey rotiferBrachionus calyciflorus?

John J. Gilbert

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The planktonic rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus was reported to have a behavioral response to the predatory rotifer Asplanchna, where individuals move up to a surface-film refuge. Here, I re-examine this response and also test the hypothesis that Asplanchna affects the propensity of B. calyciflorus to attach to glass surfaces. In eight experiments where B. calyciflorus was exposed to a strong Asplanchna stimulus for periods varying from 3 to 65 h, adults and juveniles showed no increase in propensity to settle at the surface film or to attach to glass surfaces. In treatments with and without Asplanchna, percentages of Brachionus free-swimming, attached to glass or settled at the surface film were 81–100%, 0–18% and 0–3%, respectively. Three types of defensive responses in planktonic rotifers are reviewed: (1) transgenerational, spine-development responses to the Asplanchna kairomone in many brachionids; (2) slow-onset (4–48 h) increases in attachment propensity due to Asplanchna, or just its kairomone, in the facultatively epizoic Brachionus rubens and Brachionus variabilis and in an attachment-prone clone of Brachionus dorcas (B. calyciflorus species complex) and (3) brief escape movements caused by disturbance immediately after contact or near-contact with various predators (Asplanchna, Daphnia, copepods) in Filinia, Keratella, Hexarthra and Polyarthra.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The planktonic rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus was reported to have a behavioral response to the predatory rotifer Asplanchna, where individuals move up to a surface-film refuge. Here, I re-examine this response and also test the hypothesis that Asplanchna affects the propensity of B. calyciflorus to attach to glass surfaces. In eight experiments where B. calyciflorus was exposed to a strong Asplanchna stimulus for periods varying from 3 to 65 h, adults and juveniles showed no increase in propensity to settle at the surface film or to attach to glass surfaces. In treatments with and without Asplanchna, percentages of Brachionus free-swimming, attached to glass or settled at the surface film were 81–100%, 0–18% and 0–3%, respectively. Three types of defensive responses in planktonic rotifers are reviewed: (1) transgenerational, spine-development responses to the Asplanchna kairomone in many brachionids; (2) slow-onset (4–48 h) increases in attachment propensity due to Asplanchna, or just its kairomone, in the facultatively epizoic Brachionus rubens and Brachionus variabilis and in an attachment-prone clone of Brachionus dorcas (B. calyciflorus species complex) and (3) brief escape movements caused by disturbance immediately after contact or near-contact with various predators (Asplanchna, Daphnia, copepods) in Filinia, Keratella, Hexarthra and Polyarthra.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The planktonic rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus was reported to have a behavioral response to the predatory rotifer Asplanchna, where individuals move up to a surface-film refuge. Here, I re-examine this response and also test the hypothesis that Asplanchna affects the propensity of B. calyciflorus to attach to glass surfaces. In eight experiments where B. calyciflorus was exposed to a strong Asplanchna stimulus for periods varying from 3 to 65 h, adults and juveniles showed no increase in propensity to settle at the surface film or to attach to glass surfaces. In treatments with and without Asplanchna, percentages of Brachionus free-swimming, attached to glass or settled at the surface film were 81–100%, 0–18% and 0–3%, respectively. Three types of defensive responses in planktonic rotifers are reviewed: (1) transgenerational, spine-development responses to the Asplanchna kairomone in many brachionids; (2) slow-onset (4–48 h) increases in attachment propensity due to Asplanchna, or just its kairomone, in the facultatively epizoic Brachionus rubens and Brachionus variabilis and in an attachment-prone clone of Brachionus dorcas (B. calyciflorus species complex) and (3) brief escape movements caused by disturbance immediately after contact or near-contact with various predators (Asplanchna, Daphnia, copepods) in Filinia, Keratella, Hexarthra and Polyarthra.

Key concepts: Brachionus calyciflorus, Rotifer, Kairomone, Brachionus, Biology, Plankton, Ecology, Predation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Does the predatory rotiferAsplanchnainduce a behavioral response in the prey rotiferBrachionus calyciflorus? — Research Paper | ScholarLens