2023The Sociological ReviewRequires access

Family and queer temporality among Chinese young gay men: Yes, but not yet

Muyuan Luo, Shaojie Qi, Wenbin Du

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

Based on life-history interviews conducted with Chinese young gay men, this research critically engages with the anti-family tendency in queer temporality studies. It identifies three forms of queer temporality among our informants – strategic delay, optimistic pursuit and queer passing-time – in relation to the emerging neo-Confucian familism in China, which, overall, suggests a ‘yes-but-not-yet’ queer youth temporality characterised by a combination of a selective acceptance of hetero-/homonormative familial responsibilities and a ‘not yet ready to shoulder them’ status. Caught between the assimilationist gesture and a queer standpoint, this ‘yes-but-not-yet’ queer temporality seems difficult to categorise. With a focus on our informants’ efforts to draw on different resources to pragmatically seek possibilities for a liveable life, we argue that it is more important to understand ‘queer’ in and on their terms rather than discussing how to define queer or normative to analyse our informants’ stories. In doing so, this research opens up possibilities to theorise queer temporality from an Asian perspective in relation to the emerging neo-Confucian familism. It also challenges the dichotomous thinking in queer studies that belittles the queer efforts made by the marginalised/non-Western and calls for a more context-specific queer sociology.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Based on life-history interviews conducted with Chinese young gay men, this research critically engages with the anti-family tendency in queer temporality studies. It identifies three forms of queer temporality among our informants – strategic delay, optimistic pursuit and queer passing-time – in relation to the emerging neo-Confucian familism in China, which, overall, suggests a ‘yes-but-not-yet’ queer youth temporality characterised by a combination of a selective acceptance of hetero-/homonormative familial responsibilities and a ‘not yet ready to shoulder them’ status. Caught between the assimilationist gesture and a queer standpoint, this ‘yes-but-not-yet’ queer temporality seems difficult to categorise. With a focus on our informants’ efforts to draw on different resources to pragmatically seek possibilities for a liveable life, we argue that it is more important to understand ‘queer’ in and on their terms rather than discussing how to define queer or normative to analyse our informants’ stories. In doing so, this research opens up possibilities to theorise queer temporality from an Asian perspective in relation to the emerging neo-Confucian familism. It also challenges the dichotomous thinking in queer studies that belittles the queer efforts made by the marginalised/non-Western and calls for a more context-specific queer sociology.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Based on life-history interviews conducted with Chinese young gay men, this research critically engages with the anti-family tendency in queer temporality studies. It identifies three forms of queer temporality among our informants – strategic delay, optimistic pursuit and queer passing-time – in relation to the emerging neo-Confucian familism in China, which, overall, suggests a ‘yes-but-not-yet’ queer youth temporality characterised by a combination of a selective acceptance of hetero-/homonormative familial responsibilities and a ‘not yet ready to shoulder them’ status. Caught between the assimilationist gesture and a queer standpoint, this ‘yes-but-not-yet’ queer temporality seems difficult to categorise. With a focus on our informants’ efforts to draw on different resources to pragmatically seek possibilities for a liveable life, we argue that it is more important to understand ‘queer’ in and on their terms rather than discussing how to define queer or normative to analyse our informants’ stories. In doing so, this research opens up possibilities to theorise queer temporality from an Asian perspective in relation to the emerging neo-Confucian familism. It also challenges the dichotomous thinking in queer studies that belittles the queer efforts made by the marginalised/non-Western and calls for a more context-specific queer sociology.

Key concepts: Temporality, Queer, Sociology, Gender studies, Queer theory, Context (archaeology), Heteronormativity, Aesthetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Family and queer temporality among Chinese young gay men: Yes, but not yet — Research Paper | ScholarLens