Comparative study of outcomes in patients where pneumoperitoneum is created by Veress needle versus open method in laparoscopic surgeries
Digpal Thakore, M. S. RAY, Naresh Modi, Brinda Panchal, Aditya Raval, Vishal Patel
Abstract
Open-access reader
Digpal Thakore, M. S. RAY, Naresh Modi, Brinda Panchal, Aditya Raval, Vishal Patel
Abstract
Open-access reader
Background: The establishment of pneumoperitoneum is the inevitable first step in laparoscopic surgery as it increases the distance between the anterior abdominal wall and intra-abdominal viscera, thus creating a working space. Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 50 patients. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, in first group, pneumoperitoneum is created by Veress needle and in second group, pneumoperitoneum is created by open method. Results: The open method takes less time to create pneumoperitoneum while leads to statistically significant more gas leaks as compared to the closed method. Conclusions: The open technique is almost equal to closed technique or Veress technique in terms of the time taken to complete the operation and major and minor complications because there was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of these parameters between the two techniques. The open method takes less time to create pneumoperitoneum while leads to statistically significant more gas leaks as compared to the closed method.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Background: The establishment of pneumoperitoneum is the inevitable first step in laparoscopic surgery as it increases the distance between the anterior abdominal wall and intra-abdominal viscera, thus creating a working space. Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 50 patients. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, in first group, pneumoperitoneum is created by Veress needle and in second group, pneumoperitoneum is created by open method. Results: The open method takes less time to create pneumoperitoneum while leads to statistically significant more gas leaks as compared to the closed method. Conclusions: The open technique is almost equal to closed technique or Veress technique in terms of the time taken to complete the operation and major and minor complications because there was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of these parameters between the two techniques. The open method takes less time to create pneumoperitoneum while leads to statistically significant more gas leaks as compared to the closed method.
Key concepts: Veress needle, Pneumoperitoneum, Medicine, Significant difference, Surgery, Abdominal wall, Laparoscopy, Internal medicine