ICRC Perspectives on the Interpretation of the Third Geneva Convention More Than Seventy Years after Its Adoption
Jean‐Marie Henckaerts, Kubo Mačák, Mikhail Orkin, Ellen Policinski
Abstract
Jean‐Marie Henckaerts, Kubo Mačák, Mikhail Orkin, Ellen Policinski
Abstract
Abstract This chapter aims to share the ICRC’s experience and insights in applying the treaty interpretation methodology set out in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties to the interpretation of the Geneva Conventions. It draws on the work accomplished in updating the first three Commentaries on the Geneva Conventions, focusing on the Third Geneva Convention. It explains how the rules for treaty interpretation have been applied in this process. It looks in particular at the requirement that an interpretation be carried out in good faith, the concepts of the “ordinary meaning of terms” and the “object and purpose” of a Convention. It further examines the impact of subsequent developments in practice and law on the interpretation of the Conventions and surveys the supplementary means of interpretation set out in the Vienna Convention. Finally, it examines how the Commentaries have drawn a distinction between the law as it stands today (lex lata) and the law as it should be (de lege ferenda).
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract This chapter aims to share the ICRC’s experience and insights in applying the treaty interpretation methodology set out in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties to the interpretation of the Geneva Conventions. It draws on the work accomplished in updating the first three Commentaries on the Geneva Conventions, focusing on the Third Geneva Convention. It explains how the rules for treaty interpretation have been applied in this process. It looks in particular at the requirement that an interpretation be carried out in good faith, the concepts of the “ordinary meaning of terms” and the “object and purpose” of a Convention. It further examines the impact of subsequent developments in practice and law on the interpretation of the Conventions and surveys the supplementary means of interpretation set out in the Vienna Convention. Finally, it examines how the Commentaries have drawn a distinction between the law as it stands today (lex lata) and the law as it should be (de lege ferenda).
Key concepts: Interpretation (philosophy), Convention, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Law, Treaty, Political science, Good faith, Meaning (existential)