2023•Edward Elgar Publishing eBooksRequires access

Gender quotas on boards 20 years on: a useful tool for increased wider diversity? Achievements, "broken promises" and blindspots in the Norwegian board diversity debate

Cathrine Seierstad, Carl Åberg, Hilde Fjellvær

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Gender is a dimension of diversity, but diversity is more than gender. In this chapter we comment on the board diversity debate in Norway following the acceptance/introduction of the gender quota law in 2003/2006. The meaning of board diversity can be considered contextual, contested and temporal (see Lombardo et al 2010, Tatli et al. 2012). In the Norwegian context, we argue that while there was an implicit expectation that the gender quota law for Public Limited Companies (PLC) would increase diversity both within and beyond the PLC boards, the board diversity debate and achievements in Norway have been and still are predominantly focusing on gender and the PLC context. We argue that there is a need for a wider board diversity debate and focus from organisations, politicians and in research

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Gender is a dimension of diversity, but diversity is more than gender. In this chapter we comment on the board diversity debate in Norway following the acceptance/introduction of the gender quota law in 2003/2006. The meaning of board diversity can be considered contextual, contested and temporal (see Lombardo et al 2010, Tatli et al. 2012). In the Norwegian context, we argue that while there was an implicit expectation that the gender quota law for Public Limited Companies (PLC) would increase diversity both within and beyond the PLC boards, the board diversity debate and achievements in Norway have been and still are predominantly focusing on gender and the PLC context. We argue that there is a need for a wider board diversity debate and focus from organisations, politicians and in research

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Gender is a dimension of diversity, but diversity is more than gender. In this chapter we comment on the board diversity debate in Norway following the acceptance/introduction of the gender quota law in 2003/2006. The meaning of board diversity can be considered contextual, contested and temporal (see Lombardo et al 2010, Tatli et al. 2012). In the Norwegian context, we argue that while there was an implicit expectation that the gender quota law for Public Limited Companies (PLC) would increase diversity both within and beyond the PLC boards, the board diversity debate and achievements in Norway have been and still are predominantly focusing on gender and the PLC context. We argue that there is a need for a wider board diversity debate and focus from organisations, politicians and in research

Key concepts: Diversity (politics), Norwegian, Gender diversity, Context (archaeology), Meaning (existential), Political science, Dimension (graph theory), Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Gender quotas on boards 20 years on: a useful tool for increased wider diversity? Achievements, "broken promises" and blindspots in the Norwegian board diversity debate — Research Paper | ScholarLens