ScholarLens Back to search
1998•Summaries of judgments, advisory opinions and orders of the International Court of JusticeRequires access

Legality of the use by a state of nuclear weapons in armed conflict Advisory Opinion of 8 July 1996

United Nations

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Court found, by 11 votes to 3, that it was not able to give the advisory opinion requested by the World Health Organization on the question of the Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Court found, by 11 votes to 3, that it was not able to give the advisory opinion requested by the World Health Organization on the question of the Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Court found, by 11 votes to 3, that it was not able to give the advisory opinion requested by the World Health Organization on the question of the Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict.

Key concepts: Principle of legality, Advisory opinion, Nuclear weapon, Political science, State (computer science), Law, Armed conflict, International law

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Legality of the use by a state of nuclear weapons in armed conflict Advisory Opinion of 8 July 1996 — Research Paper | ScholarLens