2020Prawo w DziałaniuOpen access

Kilka uwag o propozycji nowelizacji art. 12 i 115 Kodeksu karnego

Krzysztof Kmąk

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

The article contains comments on Łukasz Pohl’s proposal to modify Article 12 of the Criminal Code and to add Article 115 § 25 to the Criminal Code. The author of this text agrees with the thesis that it is expedient to define the premise of „short time-intervals” (Article 12 of the Criminal Code). This is justified by the existing differences in the case law. However, there is no justification for introducing a restriction on the duration of the entire continuous offence committed by multiple acts. The biggest disadvantage of the proposal is that it does not refer to the institution of a series of offences under Article 91 § 1 of the Criminal Code, which this amendment would also affect. Contrary to the author’s intentions, the proposed Article 12 § 2 of the Criminal Code does not introduce the grounds for an extraordinary aggravation of the penalty. Treating the multi-act nature of the crime as the basis for aggravation the penalty does not seem right as well.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The article contains comments on Łukasz Pohl’s proposal to modify Article 12 of the Criminal Code and to add Article 115 § 25 to the Criminal Code. The author of this text agrees with the thesis that it is expedient to define the premise of „short time-intervals” (Article 12 of the Criminal Code). This is justified by the existing differences in the case law. However, there is no justification for introducing a restriction on the duration of the entire continuous offence committed by multiple acts. The biggest disadvantage of the proposal is that it does not refer to the institution of a series of offences under Article 91 § 1 of the Criminal Code, which this amendment would also affect. Contrary to the author’s intentions, the proposed Article 12 § 2 of the Criminal Code does not introduce the grounds for an extraordinary aggravation of the penalty. Treating the multi-act nature of the crime as the basis for aggravation the penalty does not seem right as well.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The article contains comments on Łukasz Pohl’s proposal to modify Article 12 of the Criminal Code and to add Article 115 § 25 to the Criminal Code. The author of this text agrees with the thesis that it is expedient to define the premise of „short time-intervals” (Article 12 of the Criminal Code). This is justified by the existing differences in the case law. However, there is no justification for introducing a restriction on the duration of the entire continuous offence committed by multiple acts. The biggest disadvantage of the proposal is that it does not refer to the institution of a series of offences under Article 91 § 1 of the Criminal Code, which this amendment would also affect. Contrary to the author’s intentions, the proposed Article 12 § 2 of the Criminal Code does not introduce the grounds for an extraordinary aggravation of the penalty. Treating the multi-act nature of the crime as the basis for aggravation the penalty does not seem right as well.

Key concepts: Criminal code, Premise, Code (set theory), Law, Disadvantage, Criminal law, Criminal procedure, Institution

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Kilka uwag o propozycji nowelizacji art. 12 i 115 Kodeksu karnego — Research Paper | ScholarLens