2023•Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health SciencesOpen access

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy is Safe and Efficient when Performed on Early Adolescents with Adult-Sized Tools

Ajrab Ali, Wajahat Aziz, Amanullah Memon, Ubedullah Shaikh

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Aim: To report our experience of percutaneous nephtrolithotomy using adult size instruments in young adolescents. Study design: Retrospective case series Place and duration of study: Department of Urology, Isra University Hospital Hyderabad between 1st January 2006 and December 2016, Methodology: Twenty five adolescents underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy were enrolled. The records of patients between the ages of 10 and 15 years underwent percutaneous nephtrolithotomy at our institute was examined. The percutaneous nephtrolithotomy was performed using a 24-Frnephroscope. Stone burden and location were reviewed. Stone clearance was reviewed after the surgery. Renal units with ≤4mm residual stone on postoperative imaging were considered stone free. Results: Mean age of patients was 12±2 yrs. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotomy (ESWL) was required in 4 patients and one patient had retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for residual stones. The total percentage of stones removed was 84% (21/25). One patient in our group had factor VII deficiency, another had a kidney with a horseshoe shape, and a third had post-pyelolithotomy residual stones. Three patients needed blood transfusions, and one patient experienced transitory urine leakage for more than 12 hours. There were no complications that required medical or surgical attention. Conclusion: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in young adolescents is safe and effective. Adult size instruments can be used safely for percutaneous nephtrolithromy in this group of patients. Keywords: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), Adolescents, Nephrolithiasis

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aim: To report our experience of percutaneous nephtrolithotomy using adult size instruments in young adolescents. Study design: Retrospective case series Place and duration of study: Department of Urology, Isra University Hospital Hyderabad between 1st January 2006 and December 2016, Methodology: Twenty five adolescents underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy were enrolled. The records of patients between the ages of 10 and 15 years underwent percutaneous nephtrolithotomy at our institute was examined. The percutaneous nephtrolithotomy was performed using a 24-Frnephroscope. Stone burden and location were reviewed. Stone clearance was reviewed after the surgery. Renal units with ≤4mm residual stone on postoperative imaging were considered stone free. Results: Mean age of patients was 12±2 yrs. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotomy (ESWL) was required in 4 patients and one patient had retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for residual stones. The total percentage of stones removed was 84% (21/25). One patient in our group had factor VII deficiency, another had a kidney with a horseshoe shape, and a third had post-pyelolithotomy residual stones. Three patients needed blood transfusions, and one patient experienced transitory urine leakage for more than 12 hours. There were no complications that required medical or surgical attention. Conclusion: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in young adolescents is safe and effective. Adult size instruments can be used safely for percutaneous nephtrolithromy in this group of patients. Keywords: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), Adolescents, Nephrolithiasis

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aim: To report our experience of percutaneous nephtrolithotomy using adult size instruments in young adolescents. Study design: Retrospective case series Place and duration of study: Department of Urology, Isra University Hospital Hyderabad between 1st January 2006 and December 2016, Methodology: Twenty five adolescents underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy were enrolled. The records of patients between the ages of 10 and 15 years underwent percutaneous nephtrolithotomy at our institute was examined. The percutaneous nephtrolithotomy was performed using a 24-Frnephroscope. Stone burden and location were reviewed. Stone clearance was reviewed after the surgery. Renal units with ≤4mm residual stone on postoperative imaging were considered stone free. Results: Mean age of patients was 12±2 yrs. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotomy (ESWL) was required in 4 patients and one patient had retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for residual stones. The total percentage of stones removed was 84% (21/25). One patient in our group had factor VII deficiency, another had a kidney with a horseshoe shape, and a third had post-pyelolithotomy residual stones. Three patients needed blood transfusions, and one patient experienced transitory urine leakage for more than 12 hours. There were no complications that required medical or surgical attention. Conclusion: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in young adolescents is safe and effective. Adult size instruments can be used safely for percutaneous nephtrolithromy in this group of patients. Keywords: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), Adolescents, Nephrolithiasis

Key concepts: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Medicine, Lithotomy position, Percutaneous, Surgery, Kidney stones, Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, Lithotripsy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy is Safe and Efficient when Performed on Early Adolescents with Adult-Sized Tools — Research Paper | ScholarLens