2022•Volume 8: Fluids Engineering; Heat Transfer and Thermal EngineeringRequires access

Experimental Investigation of Evaporator and Condenser Placement Configuration for Oscillating Heat Pipes

Osvaldo Castro, Kieran J. Wolk, Benjamin I. Furst, Eric T. Sunada, Scott N. Roberts, Takuro Daimaru, Jim Y. J. Kuo, John M. Bellardo

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this work, we explore two different Oscillating Heat Pipe (OHP) evaporator-condenser placement configurations, and investigate and quantify the effects on thermal performance. The proposed study focuses on two different OHP evaporator-condenser configurations with a change in adiabatic length. One of the challenges in OHP literature is the variety of experiment setups, (e.g. varying condenser, evaporator, and adiabatic lengths, heat input) which makes it difficult to compare results directly. To quantitatively compare thermal performance, a (or a set of) standardized metric(s) must be used. Therefore, we define a standardizing metric to quantify OHP’s ability to conduct heat that can be used across multiple experiments and setups. This study was conducted on an additively manufactured flat-plate AlSi10Mg OHP which has a channel diameter of 1.4 mm, 22 turns, and a plate size of 200 mm × 90 mm × 4 mm. Both the evaporator and condenser are rectangles with contact areas of 46 mm by 78 mm. The OHP was charged with R134a with a 45% filling ratio. In these tests, the location of the evaporator was fixed, while the placement of the condenser is varied such that the adiabatic length ranged between 4 mm to 94 mm. The condenser temperature was maintained between 10°C to 25°C and the heat input ranged between 20W to 50W. The results showed that a reduction in adiabatic length increased the thermal conductivity. To quantify the thermal performance, the thermal conductivities of an empty and charged OHP were determined for each placement configuration, then a thermal conductivity ratio of charged and empty OHP can be determined to quantify the improved performance. For an adiabatic length of 4 mm, we observed that the OHP’s ability to conduct heat was 40 times more effective when compared to an empty OHP. It was also observed that the OHP’s ability to conduct heat was 9 times more effective when compared to an empty OHP for an adiabatic length of 94 mm. We conclude that the area outside the evaporator-condenser that is neither heated nor cooled, called the reservoir, significantly influenced the thermal performance. The OHP with a shorter adiabatic length increased the reservoir in the condenser region which showed higher thermal performance. In this placement configuration, the reservoir essentially acted as an extension of the condenser. This is a favorable condition where the subcooled liquid slugs re-enter the condenser section which affects heat transfer drastically. Thus, the placement of the evaporator-condenser will influence OHP performance due to the reservoir and warrants future work.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In this work, we explore two different Oscillating Heat Pipe (OHP) evaporator-condenser placement configurations, and investigate and quantify the effects on thermal performance. The proposed study focuses on two different OHP evaporator-condenser configurations with a change in adiabatic length. One of the challenges in OHP literature is the variety of experiment setups, (e.g. varying condenser, evaporator, and adiabatic lengths, heat input) which makes it difficult to compare results directly. To quantitatively compare thermal performance, a (or a set of) standardized metric(s) must be used. Therefore, we define a standardizing metric to quantify OHP’s ability to conduct heat that can be used across multiple experiments and setups. This study was conducted on an additively manufactured flat-plate AlSi10Mg OHP which has a channel diameter of 1.4 mm, 22 turns, and a plate size of 200 mm × 90 mm × 4 mm. Both the evaporator and condenser are rectangles with contact areas of 46 mm by 78 mm. The OHP was charged with R134a with a 45% filling ratio. In these tests, the location of the evaporator was fixed, while the placement of the condenser is varied such that the adiabatic length ranged between 4 mm to 94 mm. The condenser temperature was maintained between 10°C to 25°C and the heat input ranged between 20W to 50W. The results showed that a reduction in adiabatic length increased the thermal conductivity. To quantify the thermal performance, the thermal conductivities of an empty and charged OHP were determined for each placement configuration, then a thermal conductivity ratio of charged and empty OHP can be determined to quantify the improved performance. For an adiabatic length of 4 mm, we observed that the OHP’s ability to conduct heat was 40 times more effective when compared to an empty OHP. It was also observed that the OHP’s ability to conduct heat was 9 times more effective when compared to an empty OHP for an adiabatic length of 94 mm. We conclude that the area outside the evaporator-condenser that is neither heated nor cooled, called the reservoir, significantly influenced the thermal performance. The OHP with a shorter adiabatic length increased the reservoir in the condenser region which showed higher thermal performance. In this placement configuration, the reservoir essentially acted as an extension of the condenser. This is a favorable condition where the subcooled liquid slugs re-enter the condenser section which affects heat transfer drastically. Thus, the placement of the evaporator-condenser will influence OHP performance due to the reservoir and warrants future work.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In this work, we explore two different Oscillating Heat Pipe (OHP) evaporator-condenser placement configurations, and investigate and quantify the effects on thermal performance. The proposed study focuses on two different OHP evaporator-condenser configurations with a change in adiabatic length. One of the challenges in OHP literature is the variety of experiment setups, (e.g. varying condenser, evaporator, and adiabatic lengths, heat input) which makes it difficult to compare results directly. To quantitatively compare thermal performance, a (or a set of) standardized metric(s) must be used. Therefore, we define a standardizing metric to quantify OHP’s ability to conduct heat that can be used across multiple experiments and setups. This study was conducted on an additively manufactured flat-plate AlSi10Mg OHP which has a channel diameter of 1.4 mm, 22 turns, and a plate size of 200 mm × 90 mm × 4 mm. Both the evaporator and condenser are rectangles with contact areas of 46 mm by 78 mm. The OHP was charged with R134a with a 45% filling ratio. In these tests, the location of the evaporator was fixed, while the placement of the condenser is varied such that the adiabatic length ranged between 4 mm to 94 mm. The condenser temperature was maintained between 10°C to 25°C and the heat input ranged between 20W to 50W. The results showed that a reduction in adiabatic length increased the thermal conductivity. To quantify the thermal performance, the thermal conductivities of an empty and charged OHP were determined for each placement configuration, then a thermal conductivity ratio of charged and empty OHP can be determined to quantify the improved performance. For an adiabatic length of 4 mm, we observed that the OHP’s ability to conduct heat was 40 times more effective when compared to an empty OHP. It was also observed that the OHP’s ability to conduct heat was 9 times more effective when compared to an empty OHP for an adiabatic length of 94 mm. We conclude that the area outside the evaporator-condenser that is neither heated nor cooled, called the reservoir, significantly influenced the thermal performance. The OHP with a shorter adiabatic length increased the reservoir in the condenser region which showed higher thermal performance. In this placement configuration, the reservoir essentially acted as an extension of the condenser. This is a favorable condition where the subcooled liquid slugs re-enter the condenser section which affects heat transfer drastically. Thus, the placement of the evaporator-condenser will influence OHP performance due to the reservoir and warrants future work.

Key concepts: Condenser (optics), Evaporator, Adiabatic process, Materials science, Thermal, Mechanics, Thermal resistance, Heat pipe

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Experimental Investigation of Evaporator and Condenser Placement Configuration for Oscillating Heat Pipes — Research Paper | ScholarLens