Transparency Guidance for ChatGPT Usage in Scientific Writing
Balázs Aczél, Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers
Abstract
Open-access reader
Balázs Aczél, Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers
Abstract
Open-access reader
The use of text-generating Large Language Models (LLM), such as ChatGPT, in scholarly writing presents challenges to transparency and credibility. Journals and institutes are in need to revise their policies on whether the usage of such tools is acceptable throughout the research workflow and to provide guidance on how to safeguard transparency and credibility when LLMs are allowed to assist researchers. The present practical guideline should help those scholars who use LLMs and journals and institutes that allow using them. We also provide an example text to show a transparent usage of ChatGPT.
OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The use of text-generating Large Language Models (LLM), such as ChatGPT, in scholarly writing presents challenges to transparency and credibility. Journals and institutes are in need to revise their policies on whether the usage of such tools is acceptable throughout the research workflow and to provide guidance on how to safeguard transparency and credibility when LLMs are allowed to assist researchers. The present practical guideline should help those scholars who use LLMs and journals and institutes that allow using them. We also provide an example text to show a transparent usage of ChatGPT.
Key concepts: Credibility, Transparency (behavior), Workflow, Guideline, Public relations, Computer science, Political science, Accounting