2023•Unpublished venueOpen access

Transparency Guidance for ChatGPT Usage in Scientific Writing

Balázs Aczél, Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers

Open full text 36 citations

Abstract

The use of text-generating Large Language Models (LLM), such as ChatGPT, in scholarly writing presents challenges to transparency and credibility. Journals and institutes are in need to revise their policies on whether the usage of such tools is acceptable throughout the research workflow and to provide guidance on how to safeguard transparency and credibility when LLMs are allowed to assist researchers. The present practical guideline should help those scholars who use LLMs and journals and institutes that allow using them. We also provide an example text to show a transparent usage of ChatGPT.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The use of text-generating Large Language Models (LLM), such as ChatGPT, in scholarly writing presents challenges to transparency and credibility. Journals and institutes are in need to revise their policies on whether the usage of such tools is acceptable throughout the research workflow and to provide guidance on how to safeguard transparency and credibility when LLMs are allowed to assist researchers. The present practical guideline should help those scholars who use LLMs and journals and institutes that allow using them. We also provide an example text to show a transparent usage of ChatGPT.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The use of text-generating Large Language Models (LLM), such as ChatGPT, in scholarly writing presents challenges to transparency and credibility. Journals and institutes are in need to revise their policies on whether the usage of such tools is acceptable throughout the research workflow and to provide guidance on how to safeguard transparency and credibility when LLMs are allowed to assist researchers. The present practical guideline should help those scholars who use LLMs and journals and institutes that allow using them. We also provide an example text to show a transparent usage of ChatGPT.

Key concepts: Credibility, Transparency (behavior), Workflow, Guideline, Public relations, Computer science, Political science, Accounting

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Transparency Guidance for ChatGPT Usage in Scientific Writing — Research Paper | ScholarLens