2023•ACS CatalysisRequires access

Thoughts about Choosing a Proper Counter Electrode

Zipei Cui, Wenchao Sheng

Open publisher page 29 citations

Abstract

Using a three-electrode configuration cell to evaluate the electrocatalytic performance of materials is the standard way for initial catalyst screening. However, using Pt as the counter electrode has recently raised severe concerns as to the accuracy and reliability of evaluating the hydrogen evolution activity on nonprecious metals, as corrosion of the Pt counter electrode interferes with the results. In this contribution, we use the hydrogen evolution reaction for a case study and demonstrate several basic principles for choosing a proper counter electrode material for different scenarios. The general principle is to minimize the polarization of the counter electrode material by analyzing the reaction on the counter electrode and choosing the best catalyst for it, maximizing the counter electrode to working electrode surface area ratio, and limiting the current magnitude at the working electrode.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Using a three-electrode configuration cell to evaluate the electrocatalytic performance of materials is the standard way for initial catalyst screening. However, using Pt as the counter electrode has recently raised severe concerns as to the accuracy and reliability of evaluating the hydrogen evolution activity on nonprecious metals, as corrosion of the Pt counter electrode interferes with the results. In this contribution, we use the hydrogen evolution reaction for a case study and demonstrate several basic principles for choosing a proper counter electrode material for different scenarios. The general principle is to minimize the polarization of the counter electrode material by analyzing the reaction on the counter electrode and choosing the best catalyst for it, maximizing the counter electrode to working electrode surface area ratio, and limiting the current magnitude at the working electrode.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Using a three-electrode configuration cell to evaluate the electrocatalytic performance of materials is the standard way for initial catalyst screening. However, using Pt as the counter electrode has recently raised severe concerns as to the accuracy and reliability of evaluating the hydrogen evolution activity on nonprecious metals, as corrosion of the Pt counter electrode interferes with the results. In this contribution, we use the hydrogen evolution reaction for a case study and demonstrate several basic principles for choosing a proper counter electrode material for different scenarios. The general principle is to minimize the polarization of the counter electrode material by analyzing the reaction on the counter electrode and choosing the best catalyst for it, maximizing the counter electrode to working electrode surface area ratio, and limiting the current magnitude at the working electrode.

Key concepts: Auxiliary electrode, Palladium-hydrogen electrode, Electrode, Reversible hydrogen electrode, Standard hydrogen electrode, Reference electrode, Working electrode, Quinhydrone electrode

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Thoughts about Choosing a Proper Counter Electrode — Research Paper | ScholarLens