2022•History of Philosophy YearbookOpen access

Can We Blame Aristotle? The Case of Slavery

Artem T. Iunusov

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The recent public discussion that took place in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement and focused on the question of whether we should hold accountable proponents of slavery throughout history touched upon Aristotle, among others (although he was far from being at the centre of it). The very question of holding Aristotle accountable or blaming him for his views on slavery strikes some people as preposterous – perhaps as bearing a clear mark of partisan cultural policies. However, I see no reason it cannot be asked and discussed. Moreover, prima facie, Aristotle very well deserves to be blamed. In this paper, I attempt to classify and explore the main ways we could (and historically did) try to show that it is not appropriate to blame Aristotle, i.e., the ways we could try to excuse or vindicate him. We can attempt to do it on theoretical grounds from within his theory of slavery (§ 1), on historical or psychological grounds, external to this theory (§ 2) and on purely moral grounds (§ 3). As far as I can tell, all those attempts ultimately fail. As a result, I see nothing that would make blaming Aristotle for his views on slavery inappropriate or irrational. I conclude my discussion by touching upon the question of what forms this blaming might appropriately take.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The recent public discussion that took place in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement and focused on the question of whether we should hold accountable proponents of slavery throughout history touched upon Aristotle, among others (although he was far from being at the centre of it). The very question of holding Aristotle accountable or blaming him for his views on slavery strikes some people as preposterous – perhaps as bearing a clear mark of partisan cultural policies. However, I see no reason it cannot be asked and discussed. Moreover, prima facie, Aristotle very well deserves to be blamed. In this paper, I attempt to classify and explore the main ways we could (and historically did) try to show that it is not appropriate to blame Aristotle, i.e., the ways we could try to excuse or vindicate him. We can attempt to do it on theoretical grounds from within his theory of slavery (§ 1), on historical or psychological grounds, external to this theory (§ 2) and on purely moral grounds (§ 3). As far as I can tell, all those attempts ultimately fail. As a result, I see nothing that would make blaming Aristotle for his views on slavery inappropriate or irrational. I conclude my discussion by touching upon the question of what forms this blaming might appropriately take.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The recent public discussion that took place in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement and focused on the question of whether we should hold accountable proponents of slavery throughout history touched upon Aristotle, among others (although he was far from being at the centre of it). The very question of holding Aristotle accountable or blaming him for his views on slavery strikes some people as preposterous – perhaps as bearing a clear mark of partisan cultural policies. However, I see no reason it cannot be asked and discussed. Moreover, prima facie, Aristotle very well deserves to be blamed. In this paper, I attempt to classify and explore the main ways we could (and historically did) try to show that it is not appropriate to blame Aristotle, i.e., the ways we could try to excuse or vindicate him. We can attempt to do it on theoretical grounds from within his theory of slavery (§ 1), on historical or psychological grounds, external to this theory (§ 2) and on purely moral grounds (§ 3). As far as I can tell, all those attempts ultimately fail. As a result, I see nothing that would make blaming Aristotle for his views on slavery inappropriate or irrational. I conclude my discussion by touching upon the question of what forms this blaming might appropriately take.

Key concepts: Blame, Excuse, Prima facie, Nothing, Irrational number, Epistemology, Philosophy, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Can We Blame Aristotle? The Case of Slavery — Research Paper | ScholarLens