2022New Zealand Yearbook of International LawRequires access

Crimes against Humanity?

Claire McGeorge

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In this article, the author discusses the impact of the allegations of having committed crimes against humanity in refugee applications under New Zealand law as well as international standards. It critically assessed the findings of the New Zealand tribunals and finds that in the past, there had been a tendency to inflate the scope of the ‘crimes against humanity’ exception by conflating participation in acts of war with participation in crimes against humanity. Recent New Zealand decisions have taken a more restrictive approach by applying the test of participation in crimes against humanity to the individual applicant rather than the whole group to which they belong. The author argues that this is more in line with the purpose of the ‘crimes against humanity’ exception in the Refugee Convention.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this article, the author discusses the impact of the allegations of having committed crimes against humanity in refugee applications under New Zealand law as well as international standards. It critically assessed the findings of the New Zealand tribunals and finds that in the past, there had been a tendency to inflate the scope of the ‘crimes against humanity’ exception by conflating participation in acts of war with participation in crimes against humanity. Recent New Zealand decisions have taken a more restrictive approach by applying the test of participation in crimes against humanity to the individual applicant rather than the whole group to which they belong. The author argues that this is more in line with the purpose of the ‘crimes against humanity’ exception in the Refugee Convention.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this article, the author discusses the impact of the allegations of having committed crimes against humanity in refugee applications under New Zealand law as well as international standards. It critically assessed the findings of the New Zealand tribunals and finds that in the past, there had been a tendency to inflate the scope of the ‘crimes against humanity’ exception by conflating participation in acts of war with participation in crimes against humanity. Recent New Zealand decisions have taken a more restrictive approach by applying the test of participation in crimes against humanity to the individual applicant rather than the whole group to which they belong. The author argues that this is more in line with the purpose of the ‘crimes against humanity’ exception in the Refugee Convention.

Key concepts: Humanity, Crimes against humanity, Scope (computer science), Refugee, Political science, Convention, Criminology, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Crimes against Humanity? — Research Paper | ScholarLens