2023AIAA SCITECH 2023 ForumRequires access

Optimally tensor-structured quadrature rule for uncertainty quantification

Bingran Wang, Nicholas C. Orndorff, John T. Hwang

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2023-0741.vid Non-intrusive polynomial chaos (NIPC) is an efficient method for solving forward uncertainty quantification (UQ) problems. If using the integration-based approach, NIPC results in multidimensional integration problems that are often solved using the numerical quadrature approach. For the numerical quadrature rule, the full-grid Gauss quadrature method maintains a fully tensorial structure of univariate Gauss quadrature rule, and the number of quadrature points increases exponentially with the number of dimensions, while for the designed quadrature method, the quadrature rule does not maintain a tensorial structure and the number of quadrature points increases at a slower rate than the Gauss quadrature method. Recently, a new method called accelerated tensor-grid evaluations (ATE) was proposed to reduce the cost of model evaluations on the tensor-grid inputs. The ATE method modifies the computational graph of the model in the middle-end of a three-stage compiler so that repeated evaluations on the operation level are eliminated. With ATE, the full-grid NIPC method can be the most efficient UQ method on problems involving sparse computational graph structures. However, for many high-dimensional problems, there may exist a partially tensorial structure for the quadrature rule that is optimal to use with ATE. In this paper, we propose a new method called optimally tensor-structured quadrature rule. This method is based on the designed quadrature idea but finds the quadrature rule that has the optimal tensorial structure so that the cost of model evaluations is minimized while achieving a specific level of accuracy with the integration method. The proposed method also generates the same quadrature rule as full-grid Gauss quadrature or designed quadrature method when the optimal tensorial structure is a fully tensorial or non-tensorial structure, respectively. This method has been tested on a 4D uncertainty quantification problem that involves a low-fidelity multi-disciplinary model of a laser-beam powered UAV. On this problem, the NIPC method using the optimally tensor-structured quadrature points with ATE is at least 50% more efficient than the existing UQ methods we compared with, while achieving the same level of accuracy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2023-0741.vid Non-intrusive polynomial chaos (NIPC) is an efficient method for solving forward uncertainty quantification (UQ) problems. If using the integration-based approach, NIPC results in multidimensional integration problems that are often solved using the numerical quadrature approach. For the numerical quadrature rule, the full-grid Gauss quadrature method maintains a fully tensorial structure of univariate Gauss quadrature rule, and the number of quadrature points increases exponentially with the number of dimensions, while for the designed quadrature method, the quadrature rule does not maintain a tensorial structure and the number of quadrature points increases at a slower rate than the Gauss quadrature method. Recently, a new method called accelerated tensor-grid evaluations (ATE) was proposed to reduce the cost of model evaluations on the tensor-grid inputs. The ATE method modifies the computational graph of the model in the middle-end of a three-stage compiler so that repeated evaluations on the operation level are eliminated. With ATE, the full-grid NIPC method can be the most efficient UQ method on problems involving sparse computational graph structures. However, for many high-dimensional problems, there may exist a partially tensorial structure for the quadrature rule that is optimal to use with ATE. In this paper, we propose a new method called optimally tensor-structured quadrature rule. This method is based on the designed quadrature idea but finds the quadrature rule that has the optimal tensorial structure so that the cost of model evaluations is minimized while achieving a specific level of accuracy with the integration method. The proposed method also generates the same quadrature rule as full-grid Gauss quadrature or designed quadrature method when the optimal tensorial structure is a fully tensorial or non-tensorial structure, respectively. This method has been tested on a 4D uncertainty quantification problem that involves a low-fidelity multi-disciplinary model of a laser-beam powered UAV. On this problem, the NIPC method using the optimally tensor-structured quadrature points with ATE is at least 50% more efficient than the existing UQ methods we compared with, while achieving the same level of accuracy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2023-0741.vid Non-intrusive polynomial chaos (NIPC) is an efficient method for solving forward uncertainty quantification (UQ) problems. If using the integration-based approach, NIPC results in multidimensional integration problems that are often solved using the numerical quadrature approach. For the numerical quadrature rule, the full-grid Gauss quadrature method maintains a fully tensorial structure of univariate Gauss quadrature rule, and the number of quadrature points increases exponentially with the number of dimensions, while for the designed quadrature method, the quadrature rule does not maintain a tensorial structure and the number of quadrature points increases at a slower rate than the Gauss quadrature method. Recently, a new method called accelerated tensor-grid evaluations (ATE) was proposed to reduce the cost of model evaluations on the tensor-grid inputs. The ATE method modifies the computational graph of the model in the middle-end of a three-stage compiler so that repeated evaluations on the operation level are eliminated. With ATE, the full-grid NIPC method can be the most efficient UQ method on problems involving sparse computational graph structures. However, for many high-dimensional problems, there may exist a partially tensorial structure for the quadrature rule that is optimal to use with ATE. In this paper, we propose a new method called optimally tensor-structured quadrature rule. This method is based on the designed quadrature idea but finds the quadrature rule that has the optimal tensorial structure so that the cost of model evaluations is minimized while achieving a specific level of accuracy with the integration method. The proposed method also generates the same quadrature rule as full-grid Gauss quadrature or designed quadrature method when the optimal tensorial structure is a fully tensorial or non-tensorial structure, respectively. This method has been tested on a 4D uncertainty quantification problem that involves a low-fidelity multi-disciplinary model of a laser-beam powered UAV. On this problem, the NIPC method using the optimally tensor-structured quadrature points with ATE is at least 50% more efficient than the existing UQ methods we compared with, while achieving the same level of accuracy.

Key concepts: Gauss–Kronrod quadrature formula, Clenshaw–Curtis quadrature, Tanh-sinh quadrature, Numerical integration, Gauss–Jacobi quadrature, Gauss–Laguerre quadrature, Gauss–Hermite quadrature, Gaussian quadrature

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Optimally tensor-structured quadrature rule for uncertainty quantification — Research Paper | ScholarLens