2022Journal of Education and ResearchOpen access

Meaning Making of Lived Experiences in Phenomenological Inquiry

Binod Basnet

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Phenomenology is all about making meaning of primal lived experiences. But it is often a huge challenge to know where to start interpreting the experiences as they are lived. van Manen has described the lifeworld existentials of phenomenology to be interwoven within the lived body, lived space, lived time, and lived human relations. These existentials have a deeper significance when we seek to interpret the lived experience for a phenomenon. In phenomenology, lived body is something more than our pair of limbs, torso, and head; lived space is not meant as physical space; lived time is different from object time; and lived relation is not merely human interaction. Simply put, they are felt body, space, time, and relation. Furthermore, these existentials are inseparably interwoven with each other in such a way that a superficial understanding of lifeworld will seldom attain those wonders hidden within the lived experiences. In this article, I have tried to simplify and elaborate on these individual lifeworld existentials with reference to my prior experience of phenomenological study in educational settings so that it is convenient for beginner scholars to understand the scope of meaningmaking in phenomenology.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Phenomenology is all about making meaning of primal lived experiences. But it is often a huge challenge to know where to start interpreting the experiences as they are lived. van Manen has described the lifeworld existentials of phenomenology to be interwoven within the lived body, lived space, lived time, and lived human relations. These existentials have a deeper significance when we seek to interpret the lived experience for a phenomenon. In phenomenology, lived body is something more than our pair of limbs, torso, and head; lived space is not meant as physical space; lived time is different from object time; and lived relation is not merely human interaction. Simply put, they are felt body, space, time, and relation. Furthermore, these existentials are inseparably interwoven with each other in such a way that a superficial understanding of lifeworld will seldom attain those wonders hidden within the lived experiences. In this article, I have tried to simplify and elaborate on these individual lifeworld existentials with reference to my prior experience of phenomenological study in educational settings so that it is convenient for beginner scholars to understand the scope of meaningmaking in phenomenology.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Phenomenology is all about making meaning of primal lived experiences. But it is often a huge challenge to know where to start interpreting the experiences as they are lived. van Manen has described the lifeworld existentials of phenomenology to be interwoven within the lived body, lived space, lived time, and lived human relations. These existentials have a deeper significance when we seek to interpret the lived experience for a phenomenon. In phenomenology, lived body is something more than our pair of limbs, torso, and head; lived space is not meant as physical space; lived time is different from object time; and lived relation is not merely human interaction. Simply put, they are felt body, space, time, and relation. Furthermore, these existentials are inseparably interwoven with each other in such a way that a superficial understanding of lifeworld will seldom attain those wonders hidden within the lived experiences. In this article, I have tried to simplify and elaborate on these individual lifeworld existentials with reference to my prior experience of phenomenological study in educational settings so that it is convenient for beginner scholars to understand the scope of meaningmaking in phenomenology.

Key concepts: Lifeworld, Phenomenology (philosophy), Lived experience, Phenomenon, Epistemology, Relation (database), Meaning (existential), Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Meaning Making of Lived Experiences in Phenomenological Inquiry — Research Paper | ScholarLens