2012Clinical Psychology ForumRequires access

Assessing malingering, lying and deception for reports

Simon Easton

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Clinical psychologists writing reports draw upon their clinical expertise, and need to carefully consider the validity of the information on which their opinions are based. This article provides an overview of relevant literature on malingering and deception.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Clinical psychologists writing reports draw upon their clinical expertise, and need to carefully consider the validity of the information on which their opinions are based. This article provides an overview of relevant literature on malingering and deception.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Clinical psychologists writing reports draw upon their clinical expertise, and need to carefully consider the validity of the information on which their opinions are based. This article provides an overview of relevant literature on malingering and deception.

Key concepts: Malingering, Deception, Lying, Psychology, Lie detection, Social psychology, Applied psychology, Clinical psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessing malingering, lying and deception for reports — Research Paper | ScholarLens