Effectiveness and safety of four different beta‐blockers in patients with chronic heart failure
Baoshan Liu, Rui Zhang, Aiyuan Zhang, Guodong Wang, Jiupan Xu, Yun Zhang, Yan Liu, Panpan Hao
Abstract
Open-access reader
Baoshan Liu, Rui Zhang, Aiyuan Zhang, Guodong Wang, Jiupan Xu, Yun Zhang, Yan Liu, Panpan Hao
Abstract
Open-access reader
In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of bisoprolol, metoprolol, carvedilol, and nebivolol in the treatment of chronic heart failure. The results demonstrated that bisoprolol improved the prognosis of chronic heart failure in comparison with carvedilol, and carvedilol exerted similar effects as metoprolol succinate and nebivolol and better effect than metoprolol tartrate (evidence levels: bisoprolol > carvedilol = metoprolol succinate = nebivolol > metoprolol tartrate; " > " means "prior to").
OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of bisoprolol, metoprolol, carvedilol, and nebivolol in the treatment of chronic heart failure. The results demonstrated that bisoprolol improved the prognosis of chronic heart failure in comparison with carvedilol, and carvedilol exerted similar effects as metoprolol succinate and nebivolol and better effect than metoprolol tartrate (evidence levels: bisoprolol > carvedilol = metoprolol succinate = nebivolol > metoprolol tartrate; " > " means "prior to").
Key concepts: Bisoprolol, Carvedilol, Metoprolol Tartrate, Metoprolol, Nebivolol, Heart failure, Medicine, Pharmacology