One filter may be enough for duplicate inferior vena cava filter implantation in patients with deep venous thrombosis: Two cases report
Tao Li, Qi Wang, Wei Wang, Jun Jie Yang, Shuilin Dong
Abstract
Tao Li, Qi Wang, Wei Wang, Jun Jie Yang, Shuilin Dong
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Duplicate inferior vena cava (IVC) is an uncommon congenital malformation, but should be treated carefully under the circumstances of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). However, there is a paucity of clinical guidance on this situation. METHODS: Duplicate IVC was diagnosed based on the imaging examination that revealed the dual IVC. Deep venous thrombosis was diagnosed by Compression Doppler ultrasonography of both lower extremities with the high-elevated D-dimer. Retrievable IVC filters were implanted to prevent massive and fatal pulmonary embolism. Appropriate anticoagulation therapy was also performed. RESULTS: Two retrievable filters were successfully implanted and retrieved in two patients with deep venous thrombosis and duplicate inferior vena cava, respectively. During further follow-up, no adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive imaging examination might contribute to the diagnosis of duplicate IVC, especially when individual conditions were limited. The position above the confluence of bilateral IVCs might be an appropriate suprarenal retrievable filter insertion location. To deal with different types of dual IVC anatomy, different strategies should be taken into consideration.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: Duplicate inferior vena cava (IVC) is an uncommon congenital malformation, but should be treated carefully under the circumstances of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). However, there is a paucity of clinical guidance on this situation. METHODS: Duplicate IVC was diagnosed based on the imaging examination that revealed the dual IVC. Deep venous thrombosis was diagnosed by Compression Doppler ultrasonography of both lower extremities with the high-elevated D-dimer. Retrievable IVC filters were implanted to prevent massive and fatal pulmonary embolism. Appropriate anticoagulation therapy was also performed. RESULTS: Two retrievable filters were successfully implanted and retrieved in two patients with deep venous thrombosis and duplicate inferior vena cava, respectively. During further follow-up, no adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive imaging examination might contribute to the diagnosis of duplicate IVC, especially when individual conditions were limited. The position above the confluence of bilateral IVCs might be an appropriate suprarenal retrievable filter insertion location. To deal with different types of dual IVC anatomy, different strategies should be taken into consideration.
Key concepts: Medicine, Inferior vena cava, Pulmonary embolism, Venous thrombosis, Radiology, Thrombosis, Deep vein, Inferior vena cava filter