2022•MedicineOpen access

One filter may be enough for duplicate inferior vena cava filter implantation in patients with deep venous thrombosis: Two cases report

Tao Li, Qi Wang, Wei Wang, Jun Jie Yang, Shuilin Dong

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Duplicate inferior vena cava (IVC) is an uncommon congenital malformation, but should be treated carefully under the circumstances of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). However, there is a paucity of clinical guidance on this situation. METHODS: Duplicate IVC was diagnosed based on the imaging examination that revealed the dual IVC. Deep venous thrombosis was diagnosed by Compression Doppler ultrasonography of both lower extremities with the high-elevated D-dimer. Retrievable IVC filters were implanted to prevent massive and fatal pulmonary embolism. Appropriate anticoagulation therapy was also performed. RESULTS: Two retrievable filters were successfully implanted and retrieved in two patients with deep venous thrombosis and duplicate inferior vena cava, respectively. During further follow-up, no adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive imaging examination might contribute to the diagnosis of duplicate IVC, especially when individual conditions were limited. The position above the confluence of bilateral IVCs might be an appropriate suprarenal retrievable filter insertion location. To deal with different types of dual IVC anatomy, different strategies should be taken into consideration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Duplicate inferior vena cava (IVC) is an uncommon congenital malformation, but should be treated carefully under the circumstances of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). However, there is a paucity of clinical guidance on this situation. METHODS: Duplicate IVC was diagnosed based on the imaging examination that revealed the dual IVC. Deep venous thrombosis was diagnosed by Compression Doppler ultrasonography of both lower extremities with the high-elevated D-dimer. Retrievable IVC filters were implanted to prevent massive and fatal pulmonary embolism. Appropriate anticoagulation therapy was also performed. RESULTS: Two retrievable filters were successfully implanted and retrieved in two patients with deep venous thrombosis and duplicate inferior vena cava, respectively. During further follow-up, no adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive imaging examination might contribute to the diagnosis of duplicate IVC, especially when individual conditions were limited. The position above the confluence of bilateral IVCs might be an appropriate suprarenal retrievable filter insertion location. To deal with different types of dual IVC anatomy, different strategies should be taken into consideration.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Duplicate inferior vena cava (IVC) is an uncommon congenital malformation, but should be treated carefully under the circumstances of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). However, there is a paucity of clinical guidance on this situation. METHODS: Duplicate IVC was diagnosed based on the imaging examination that revealed the dual IVC. Deep venous thrombosis was diagnosed by Compression Doppler ultrasonography of both lower extremities with the high-elevated D-dimer. Retrievable IVC filters were implanted to prevent massive and fatal pulmonary embolism. Appropriate anticoagulation therapy was also performed. RESULTS: Two retrievable filters were successfully implanted and retrieved in two patients with deep venous thrombosis and duplicate inferior vena cava, respectively. During further follow-up, no adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive imaging examination might contribute to the diagnosis of duplicate IVC, especially when individual conditions were limited. The position above the confluence of bilateral IVCs might be an appropriate suprarenal retrievable filter insertion location. To deal with different types of dual IVC anatomy, different strategies should be taken into consideration.

Key concepts: Medicine, Inferior vena cava, Pulmonary embolism, Venous thrombosis, Radiology, Thrombosis, Deep vein, Inferior vena cava filter

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
One filter may be enough for duplicate inferior vena cava filter implantation in patients with deep venous thrombosis: Two cases report — Research Paper | ScholarLens