Pneumothorax in patients with COPD and emphysema receiving home chronic non-invasive ventilation: is it the emphysema phenotype or ventilator setting?
Joanne Sloots, Marieke L. Duiverman
Abstract
Open-access reader
Joanne Sloots, Marieke L. Duiverman
Abstract
Open-access reader
We describe three patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and emphysema who developed a pneumothorax while receiving chronic home non-invasive ventilation (NIV). These cases raise the question whether the high alveolar pressures given by NIV may have contributed to the development of their pneumothorax by barotrauma. Pneumothorax in patients with COPD receiving NIV is uncommon, the pressures in our patients with COPD who developed pneumothorax were not extremely high and time to development of pneumothorax was relatively long after the initiation of NIV. Further, in our patients, the CT scan showed paraseptal emphysema, a known risk factor for pneumothorax. This suggests that COPD/emphysema phenotype is probably a more important factor for indicating pneumothorax risk than ventilator settings. Better phenotyping of patients with COPD in whom benefits of NIV can be expected at minimal risk of serious side-effects is needed to inform our patients properly and bring the field of chronic NIV in COPD forward.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We describe three patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and emphysema who developed a pneumothorax while receiving chronic home non-invasive ventilation (NIV). These cases raise the question whether the high alveolar pressures given by NIV may have contributed to the development of their pneumothorax by barotrauma. Pneumothorax in patients with COPD receiving NIV is uncommon, the pressures in our patients with COPD who developed pneumothorax were not extremely high and time to development of pneumothorax was relatively long after the initiation of NIV. Further, in our patients, the CT scan showed paraseptal emphysema, a known risk factor for pneumothorax. This suggests that COPD/emphysema phenotype is probably a more important factor for indicating pneumothorax risk than ventilator settings. Better phenotyping of patients with COPD in whom benefits of NIV can be expected at minimal risk of serious side-effects is needed to inform our patients properly and bring the field of chronic NIV in COPD forward.
Key concepts: Medicine, COPD, Pneumothorax, Pulmonary disease, Ventilation (architecture), Noninvasive ventilation, Pulmonary emphysema, Intensive care medicine