Regional economic impacts of the Canadian beef processing sector
Suren Kulshreshtha
Abstract
Open-access reader
Suren Kulshreshtha
Abstract
Open-access reader
Observations of direct contributions of a sector are easily observable and are frequently used as a measure of the importance of an economic sector. However, it is the contention of this study that such a process seriously underestimates the total contribution made by an economic sector. In this study, the economic impacts of the beef processing sector are estimated as total economic impacts which include the direct contributions made by the beef processing sector plus all the secondary impacts. Impacts were measured in terms of the level of sales, gross domestic product (GDP), labor income, and employment levels. In each of these cases, multiplier activity generated by the beef processing sector was two to five times (and in some cases even more) the direct impacts. It is the conclusion of this study that the total economic impacts of a sector are a better indicator of the importance of an economic sector than direct impacts.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Observations of direct contributions of a sector are easily observable and are frequently used as a measure of the importance of an economic sector. However, it is the contention of this study that such a process seriously underestimates the total contribution made by an economic sector. In this study, the economic impacts of the beef processing sector are estimated as total economic impacts which include the direct contributions made by the beef processing sector plus all the secondary impacts. Impacts were measured in terms of the level of sales, gross domestic product (GDP), labor income, and employment levels. In each of these cases, multiplier activity generated by the beef processing sector was two to five times (and in some cases even more) the direct impacts. It is the conclusion of this study that the total economic impacts of a sector are a better indicator of the importance of an economic sector than direct impacts.
Key concepts: Economic sector, Economic impact analysis, Gross domestic product, Economics, Multiplier (economics), Tertiary sector of the economy, Food sector, Agricultural economics