2022International Journal of Business and Applied Social ScienceOpen access

Regional economic impacts of the Canadian beef processing sector

Suren Kulshreshtha

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Observations of direct contributions of a sector are easily observable and are frequently used as a measure of the importance of an economic sector. However, it is the contention of this study that such a process seriously underestimates the total contribution made by an economic sector. In this study, the economic impacts of the beef processing sector are estimated as total economic impacts which include the direct contributions made by the beef processing sector plus all the secondary impacts. Impacts were measured in terms of the level of sales, gross domestic product (GDP), labor income, and employment levels. In each of these cases, multiplier activity generated by the beef processing sector was two to five times (and in some cases even more) the direct impacts. It is the conclusion of this study that the total economic impacts of a sector are a better indicator of the importance of an economic sector than direct impacts.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Observations of direct contributions of a sector are easily observable and are frequently used as a measure of the importance of an economic sector. However, it is the contention of this study that such a process seriously underestimates the total contribution made by an economic sector. In this study, the economic impacts of the beef processing sector are estimated as total economic impacts which include the direct contributions made by the beef processing sector plus all the secondary impacts. Impacts were measured in terms of the level of sales, gross domestic product (GDP), labor income, and employment levels. In each of these cases, multiplier activity generated by the beef processing sector was two to five times (and in some cases even more) the direct impacts. It is the conclusion of this study that the total economic impacts of a sector are a better indicator of the importance of an economic sector than direct impacts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Observations of direct contributions of a sector are easily observable and are frequently used as a measure of the importance of an economic sector. However, it is the contention of this study that such a process seriously underestimates the total contribution made by an economic sector. In this study, the economic impacts of the beef processing sector are estimated as total economic impacts which include the direct contributions made by the beef processing sector plus all the secondary impacts. Impacts were measured in terms of the level of sales, gross domestic product (GDP), labor income, and employment levels. In each of these cases, multiplier activity generated by the beef processing sector was two to five times (and in some cases even more) the direct impacts. It is the conclusion of this study that the total economic impacts of a sector are a better indicator of the importance of an economic sector than direct impacts.

Key concepts: Economic sector, Economic impact analysis, Gross domestic product, Economics, Multiplier (economics), Tertiary sector of the economy, Food sector, Agricultural economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Regional economic impacts of the Canadian beef processing sector — Research Paper | ScholarLens