1941The Journal of ImmunologyRequires access

Studies on the Mechanism of Sulfonamide Bacteriostasis, Inhibition and Resistance

Elias Strauss, John H. Dingle, Maxwell Finland

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

Summary A strain of E. coli was studied which, in a simple synthetic medium, required nicotinic acid or nicotinamide for growth from small inocula. Growth was also improved by increasing the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Sulfathiazole, sulfadiazine, sulfapyridine, sulfaguanidine and sulfanilamide were bacteriostatic in relatively small concentrations, as compared with their activity against this organism in complex media. Nicotinamide, nicotinic acid and coenzyme I did not inhibit the action of these sulfonamide drugs. P-aminobenzoic acid is a strong inhibitor of sulfonamide action, methionine a weak inhibitor. Differences in the effect of methionine on various sulfonamide drugs may be quantitative rather than qualitative. The development of resistance to sulfonamide action has been produced with E. coli in a simple medium. P-aminobenzoic acid prevents the development of sulfonamide resistance, while methionine delays but does not prevent the development of resistance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary A strain of E. coli was studied which, in a simple synthetic medium, required nicotinic acid or nicotinamide for growth from small inocula. Growth was also improved by increasing the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Sulfathiazole, sulfadiazine, sulfapyridine, sulfaguanidine and sulfanilamide were bacteriostatic in relatively small concentrations, as compared with their activity against this organism in complex media. Nicotinamide, nicotinic acid and coenzyme I did not inhibit the action of these sulfonamide drugs. P-aminobenzoic acid is a strong inhibitor of sulfonamide action, methionine a weak inhibitor. Differences in the effect of methionine on various sulfonamide drugs may be quantitative rather than qualitative. The development of resistance to sulfonamide action has been produced with E. coli in a simple medium. P-aminobenzoic acid prevents the development of sulfonamide resistance, while methionine delays but does not prevent the development of resistance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary A strain of E. coli was studied which, in a simple synthetic medium, required nicotinic acid or nicotinamide for growth from small inocula. Growth was also improved by increasing the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Sulfathiazole, sulfadiazine, sulfapyridine, sulfaguanidine and sulfanilamide were bacteriostatic in relatively small concentrations, as compared with their activity against this organism in complex media. Nicotinamide, nicotinic acid and coenzyme I did not inhibit the action of these sulfonamide drugs. P-aminobenzoic acid is a strong inhibitor of sulfonamide action, methionine a weak inhibitor. Differences in the effect of methionine on various sulfonamide drugs may be quantitative rather than qualitative. The development of resistance to sulfonamide action has been produced with E. coli in a simple medium. P-aminobenzoic acid prevents the development of sulfonamide resistance, while methionine delays but does not prevent the development of resistance.

Key concepts: Sulfonamide, Sulfanilamide, Sulfathiazole, Sulfapyridine, Sulfadiazine, Sulfisoxazole, Chemistry, Nicotinamide

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Studies on the Mechanism of Sulfonamide Bacteriostasis, Inhibition and Resistance — Research Paper | ScholarLens