2022Unpublished venueRequires access

FeNO is not affected by spirometry, IOS or walking in healthy subjects or well controlled asthma patients

Helle Haagensen Andersen, L M Pedersen, M Mousa, N Mousa, Anne‐Sofie Bjerrum, Tina Skjold, Torben Smidt-Hansen, Hans Jürgen Hoffmann, Johannes Martin Schmid

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background: Measuring FeNO is a convenient, non-invasive method to assess airway inflammation. In asthmatics, elevated FeNO can predict treatment response to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and it can be used to monitor treatment adherence and guide step-up or step-down of ICS treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate, whether spirometry, IOS or walking affected FeNO measurement. Methods: FeNO was measured twice at baseline in 25 healthy controls and 21 patients with well-controlled asthma, and was repeated after performing IOS, spirometry and after walking 400 m. Reproducibility was assessed with a Bland-Altman test where the bias(B), upper limits of agreement (ULOA) and lower limits (LLOA) of agreement are calculated as % mean of collected data. These calculations will be written to as [B; ULOA; LLOA]. Results: At baseline mean FeNO was 16.0 (95% CI 12.3-19.8) in the healthy subjects and 20.2 (14.9-25.6) ppb in the asthmatics. There was no significant change in FeNO at baseline [0.258; 74.2;-74.8], after IOS [-9.21; 56.4;-74.9], spirometry [-3.65; 75.8;-83.1] or after walking [-4.18; 92.5;-84.1]. The limits of agreement in a Bland-Altman plot were 12 ppb, less than the clinically significant difference. There was no trend to bias in the Bland-Altman plots. Conclusion: Measurement of FeNO in healthy subjects and well-controlled asthmatics is not affected by performing IOS, spirometry, or exercise.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Measuring FeNO is a convenient, non-invasive method to assess airway inflammation. In asthmatics, elevated FeNO can predict treatment response to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and it can be used to monitor treatment adherence and guide step-up or step-down of ICS treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate, whether spirometry, IOS or walking affected FeNO measurement. Methods: FeNO was measured twice at baseline in 25 healthy controls and 21 patients with well-controlled asthma, and was repeated after performing IOS, spirometry and after walking 400 m. Reproducibility was assessed with a Bland-Altman test where the bias(B), upper limits of agreement (ULOA) and lower limits (LLOA) of agreement are calculated as % mean of collected data. These calculations will be written to as [B; ULOA; LLOA]. Results: At baseline mean FeNO was 16.0 (95% CI 12.3-19.8) in the healthy subjects and 20.2 (14.9-25.6) ppb in the asthmatics. There was no significant change in FeNO at baseline [0.258; 74.2;-74.8], after IOS [-9.21; 56.4;-74.9], spirometry [-3.65; 75.8;-83.1] or after walking [-4.18; 92.5;-84.1]. The limits of agreement in a Bland-Altman plot were 12 ppb, less than the clinically significant difference. There was no trend to bias in the Bland-Altman plots. Conclusion: Measurement of FeNO in healthy subjects and well-controlled asthmatics is not affected by performing IOS, spirometry, or exercise.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Measuring FeNO is a convenient, non-invasive method to assess airway inflammation. In asthmatics, elevated FeNO can predict treatment response to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and it can be used to monitor treatment adherence and guide step-up or step-down of ICS treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate, whether spirometry, IOS or walking affected FeNO measurement. Methods: FeNO was measured twice at baseline in 25 healthy controls and 21 patients with well-controlled asthma, and was repeated after performing IOS, spirometry and after walking 400 m. Reproducibility was assessed with a Bland-Altman test where the bias(B), upper limits of agreement (ULOA) and lower limits (LLOA) of agreement are calculated as % mean of collected data. These calculations will be written to as [B; ULOA; LLOA]. Results: At baseline mean FeNO was 16.0 (95% CI 12.3-19.8) in the healthy subjects and 20.2 (14.9-25.6) ppb in the asthmatics. There was no significant change in FeNO at baseline [0.258; 74.2;-74.8], after IOS [-9.21; 56.4;-74.9], spirometry [-3.65; 75.8;-83.1] or after walking [-4.18; 92.5;-84.1]. The limits of agreement in a Bland-Altman plot were 12 ppb, less than the clinically significant difference. There was no trend to bias in the Bland-Altman plots. Conclusion: Measurement of FeNO in healthy subjects and well-controlled asthmatics is not affected by performing IOS, spirometry, or exercise.

Key concepts: Spirometry, Limits of agreement, Medicine, Asthma, Bland–Altman plot, Mean difference, Physical therapy, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
FeNO is not affected by spirometry, IOS or walking in healthy subjects or well controlled asthma patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens