Sonority Waves in Syllabification
Caroline R. Wiltshire
Abstract
Caroline R. Wiltshire
Abstract
The current emphasis on markedness constraints in phonology has deep historical roots in the development of syllable phonotactics, with sonority playing a salient role from the beginning. Goldsmith (2011) points to the use of sonority in syllabification dating back to pre-generativists Panini, Whitney (1874), Jesperson (1904), and Pike (1947) among others. In his review of the concept of “syllable”, Goldsmith concludes “Sonority, and the wave-like recurrence of peaks of sonority, seems to me to be the fundamental pattern of syllabification in language” (2011: 29). The use of waves can be compared and contrasted to the use of constituent structure for modelling the role of sonority in phonology, via examples such as syllabification and alternations within L1s, adaptations of words borrowed from L2s, and acquisition of L2s syllables and consonant clusters. While phonotactics in terms of syllable constituents can be developed to account for (most of) these examples, the sonority wave approach provides not only an account, but also a motivation.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The current emphasis on markedness constraints in phonology has deep historical roots in the development of syllable phonotactics, with sonority playing a salient role from the beginning. Goldsmith (2011) points to the use of sonority in syllabification dating back to pre-generativists Panini, Whitney (1874), Jesperson (1904), and Pike (1947) among others. In his review of the concept of “syllable”, Goldsmith concludes “Sonority, and the wave-like recurrence of peaks of sonority, seems to me to be the fundamental pattern of syllabification in language” (2011: 29). The use of waves can be compared and contrasted to the use of constituent structure for modelling the role of sonority in phonology, via examples such as syllabification and alternations within L1s, adaptations of words borrowed from L2s, and acquisition of L2s syllables and consonant clusters. While phonotactics in terms of syllable constituents can be developed to account for (most of) these examples, the sonority wave approach provides not only an account, but also a motivation.
Key concepts: Sonority hierarchy, Syllabification, Phonotactics, Syllable, Phonology, Linguistics, Consonant, Computer science