2022•CriminologieOpen access

Beyond criminalization: Immigration and the challenges for criminology

João Velloso

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

This paper discusses the increasing importance of administrative punishment in the penal field, using the judicialization of immigration conflicts in Canada as an example. Based on documentary analysis and the results of fieldwork conducted at the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada between 2007 and 2009, I will present some characteristics of the legal translation of conflicts in immigration law and the forms of punishment involved. I will argue that these differ substantially from those in criminal law. My ultimate goal is to question the idea of criminalization of immigration as a category capable of nuancing the complexity of administrative forms of social response. Instead, I suggest that we should understand the forms of punishment in administrative law as they are (police measures and administrative sanctions), rethinking their role in the penal field to better understand how these forms of penalisation may even supplement or superimpose traditional criminalisation processes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper discusses the increasing importance of administrative punishment in the penal field, using the judicialization of immigration conflicts in Canada as an example. Based on documentary analysis and the results of fieldwork conducted at the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada between 2007 and 2009, I will present some characteristics of the legal translation of conflicts in immigration law and the forms of punishment involved. I will argue that these differ substantially from those in criminal law. My ultimate goal is to question the idea of criminalization of immigration as a category capable of nuancing the complexity of administrative forms of social response. Instead, I suggest that we should understand the forms of punishment in administrative law as they are (police measures and administrative sanctions), rethinking their role in the penal field to better understand how these forms of penalisation may even supplement or superimpose traditional criminalisation processes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper discusses the increasing importance of administrative punishment in the penal field, using the judicialization of immigration conflicts in Canada as an example. Based on documentary analysis and the results of fieldwork conducted at the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada between 2007 and 2009, I will present some characteristics of the legal translation of conflicts in immigration law and the forms of punishment involved. I will argue that these differ substantially from those in criminal law. My ultimate goal is to question the idea of criminalization of immigration as a category capable of nuancing the complexity of administrative forms of social response. Instead, I suggest that we should understand the forms of punishment in administrative law as they are (police measures and administrative sanctions), rethinking their role in the penal field to better understand how these forms of penalisation may even supplement or superimpose traditional criminalisation processes.

Key concepts: Criminalization, Immigration, Sanctions, Criminology, Punishment (psychology), Immigration law, Criminal law, Immigration detention

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Beyond criminalization: Immigration and the challenges for criminology — Research Paper | ScholarLens