2022International Journal of Quantum ChemistryRequires access

Comparative QSAR modeling of 2‐phenylindol derivatives for predicting the anticancer activity using genetic algorithm multiple linear regression and back‐propagation‐artificial neural network techniques

Samira Bahrami, Fatemeh Shafiei, Azam Marjani, Tahereh Momeni Isfahani

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) studies on a series of 2‐phenylindole derivatives as anticancer drugs were performed to choice the important descriptor, which is responsible for their anticancer activity (expressed as pIC50). The geometry optimizations were performed on the structures using Gaussian software with the density functional B3LYP and 6‐311G(d,p) basis sets. Dragon software was used to calculate molecular descriptors, and the genetic algorithm (GA) procedure and backward regression were used to proper selection of the most relevant descriptors. The backward multiple linear regression (BW‐MLR) and backpropagation‐artificial artificial neural network (BP‐ANN) were carried out to design QSAR models. The squared correlation coefficient (R2) and the root mean squared error (RMSE) values of the GA‐MLR model were calculated to be 0.2843 and 0.7001, respectively. The BP‐ANN model was the most powerful, with the square of predictive correlation coefficient R2pred, root mean square error (RMSE), and absolute average deviation (AAD) which was equal to 0.9416, 0.0238, and 0.0099, respectively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) studies on a series of 2‐phenylindole derivatives as anticancer drugs were performed to choice the important descriptor, which is responsible for their anticancer activity (expressed as pIC50). The geometry optimizations were performed on the structures using Gaussian software with the density functional B3LYP and 6‐311G(d,p) basis sets. Dragon software was used to calculate molecular descriptors, and the genetic algorithm (GA) procedure and backward regression were used to proper selection of the most relevant descriptors. The backward multiple linear regression (BW‐MLR) and backpropagation‐artificial artificial neural network (BP‐ANN) were carried out to design QSAR models. The squared correlation coefficient (R2) and the root mean squared error (RMSE) values of the GA‐MLR model were calculated to be 0.2843 and 0.7001, respectively. The BP‐ANN model was the most powerful, with the square of predictive correlation coefficient R2pred, root mean square error (RMSE), and absolute average deviation (AAD) which was equal to 0.9416, 0.0238, and 0.0099, respectively.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) studies on a series of 2‐phenylindole derivatives as anticancer drugs were performed to choice the important descriptor, which is responsible for their anticancer activity (expressed as pIC50). The geometry optimizations were performed on the structures using Gaussian software with the density functional B3LYP and 6‐311G(d,p) basis sets. Dragon software was used to calculate molecular descriptors, and the genetic algorithm (GA) procedure and backward regression were used to proper selection of the most relevant descriptors. The backward multiple linear regression (BW‐MLR) and backpropagation‐artificial artificial neural network (BP‐ANN) were carried out to design QSAR models. The squared correlation coefficient (R2) and the root mean squared error (RMSE) values of the GA‐MLR model were calculated to be 0.2843 and 0.7001, respectively. The BP‐ANN model was the most powerful, with the square of predictive correlation coefficient R2pred, root mean square error (RMSE), and absolute average deviation (AAD) which was equal to 0.9416, 0.0238, and 0.0099, respectively.

Key concepts: Quantitative structure–activity relationship, Mean squared error, Backpropagation, Artificial neural network, Correlation coefficient, Linear regression, Coefficient of determination, Gaussian

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative QSAR modeling of 2‐phenylindol derivatives for predicting the anticancer activity using genetic algorithm multiple linear regression and back‐propagation‐artificial neural network techniques — Research Paper | ScholarLens