2022INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHRequires access

COMPARISON OF FOCAL LASER WITH INTRAVITREAL TRIAMCINOLONE INJECTION AS TREATMENT FOR MACULAR OEDEMA FOLLOWING BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION

Nameirakpam Mamota, Laishram Usharani, Khundrakpam Lokeshwari, Thoudam Avita Devi, Bibhudutta Pradhan, Rubu Yaming

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background: Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion is a sight threatening disease in which Macular edema is the most important cause of central visual loss. Grid laser photocoagulation was the only treatment for macular oedema. Nowadays, intravitreal injection of vascular endothelial growth factors inhibitors and triamcinolone acetonide can play a role in management of BRVO. To study the visual acuity after focal laser and Objective: intravitreal triamcinolone injection and to compare the visual outcome of focal laser with intravitreal triamcinolone injection. 30 eyes Methods: were taken up for study. Based on the FFA ndings, the area with capillary non perfusion were excluded from the treatment. Only 24 cases were included in the treatment with focal laser and IVTA. The study groups were di Result: vided into Group 1 (underwent focal laser) and Group 2 (underwent Triamcinolone injection). The p-value was >0.5 and there was no signicant difference in the visual outcome among the 2 groups. Conclusion: The therapeutics effects of Triamcinolone showed no signicant difference compared with focal laser with regard to visual outcomes but seemed to cause more adverse events. Therefore, further large randomized trials with longer follow up are needed to compare the long term safety and efcacy of these treatments provide sustainable concrete.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion is a sight threatening disease in which Macular edema is the most important cause of central visual loss. Grid laser photocoagulation was the only treatment for macular oedema. Nowadays, intravitreal injection of vascular endothelial growth factors inhibitors and triamcinolone acetonide can play a role in management of BRVO. To study the visual acuity after focal laser and Objective: intravitreal triamcinolone injection and to compare the visual outcome of focal laser with intravitreal triamcinolone injection. 30 eyes Methods: were taken up for study. Based on the FFA ndings, the area with capillary non perfusion were excluded from the treatment. Only 24 cases were included in the treatment with focal laser and IVTA. The study groups were di Result: vided into Group 1 (underwent focal laser) and Group 2 (underwent Triamcinolone injection). The p-value was >0.5 and there was no signicant difference in the visual outcome among the 2 groups. Conclusion: The therapeutics effects of Triamcinolone showed no signicant difference compared with focal laser with regard to visual outcomes but seemed to cause more adverse events. Therefore, further large randomized trials with longer follow up are needed to compare the long term safety and efcacy of these treatments provide sustainable concrete.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion is a sight threatening disease in which Macular edema is the most important cause of central visual loss. Grid laser photocoagulation was the only treatment for macular oedema. Nowadays, intravitreal injection of vascular endothelial growth factors inhibitors and triamcinolone acetonide can play a role in management of BRVO. To study the visual acuity after focal laser and Objective: intravitreal triamcinolone injection and to compare the visual outcome of focal laser with intravitreal triamcinolone injection. 30 eyes Methods: were taken up for study. Based on the FFA ndings, the area with capillary non perfusion were excluded from the treatment. Only 24 cases were included in the treatment with focal laser and IVTA. The study groups were di Result: vided into Group 1 (underwent focal laser) and Group 2 (underwent Triamcinolone injection). The p-value was >0.5 and there was no signicant difference in the visual outcome among the 2 groups. Conclusion: The therapeutics effects of Triamcinolone showed no signicant difference compared with focal laser with regard to visual outcomes but seemed to cause more adverse events. Therefore, further large randomized trials with longer follow up are needed to compare the long term safety and efcacy of these treatments provide sustainable concrete.

Key concepts: Triamcinolone acetonide, Medicine, Branch retinal vein occlusion, Macular edema, Ophthalmology, Central retinal vein occlusion, Acetonide, Visual acuity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARISON OF FOCAL LASER WITH INTRAVITREAL TRIAMCINOLONE INJECTION AS TREATMENT FOR MACULAR OEDEMA FOLLOWING BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION — Research Paper | ScholarLens