Use of High-Glucose Alerts is Associated With Better Glycemic Control in Individuals Using Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring
Joost van der Linden, Gérald Zammit, Giada Acciaroli, Courtney R. Green
Abstract
Open-access reader
Joost van der Linden, Gérald Zammit, Giada Acciaroli, Courtney R. Green
Abstract
Open-access reader
The clinical efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) is well established.The Dexcom G6 RT-CGM mobile app allows access to several features, including a "High Glucose" threshold alert (programmable between 120 and 400 mg/dL).The presence of alerts as in RT-CGM systems is associated with improved glycemic outcomes compared to intermittently scanned CGM (IS-CGM) systems which lack alerts. 1 Lower glucose thresholds for hyperglycemia alerts have been associated with improved glycemic outcomes.2 However, some users experience alarm fatigue.3 In this analysis of real-world data, we explored the impact of permanently disabling this alert in a large cohort of Dexcom G6 users.A random subsample of 500 000 U.S.-based users was obtained with a first glucose upload date between July 1, 2020 and June 30, 2022.In this subsample, 46 159 users (11.5%) disabled the high-glucose alert.Next, we identified 3674 users who disabled the high-glucose alert after having it initially enabled (DHG) and 3674 case-matched users who never disabled the high-glucose alert (NDHG).Rigorous case-matching was employed with respect to the time between the first most recent upload dates.The index date was defined as the date that the DHG user disabled their high-glucose alert.Glycemic control and number of initial high-glucose alerts were compared between the DHG and NDHG groups.The DHG group experienced a clear deterioration in percent time in range (%TIR) in the days leading up to the index date and a striking decrease in %TIR on the index date before recovering to a new, slightly lower steady state (Figure 1a).Average percent time above range (%TAR) and mean glucose followed a similar, but inverted, pattern (Figure 1b and c).Interestingly, aside from a few days before the index date, 1140115D STXXX10.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The clinical efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) is well established.The Dexcom G6 RT-CGM mobile app allows access to several features, including a "High Glucose" threshold alert (programmable between 120 and 400 mg/dL).The presence of alerts as in RT-CGM systems is associated with improved glycemic outcomes compared to intermittently scanned CGM (IS-CGM) systems which lack alerts. 1 Lower glucose thresholds for hyperglycemia alerts have been associated with improved glycemic outcomes.2 However, some users experience alarm fatigue.3 In this analysis of real-world data, we explored the impact of permanently disabling this alert in a large cohort of Dexcom G6 users.A random subsample of 500 000 U.S.-based users was obtained with a first glucose upload date between July 1, 2020 and June 30, 2022.In this subsample, 46 159 users (11.5%) disabled the high-glucose alert.Next, we identified 3674 users who disabled the high-glucose alert after having it initially enabled (DHG) and 3674 case-matched users who never disabled the high-glucose alert (NDHG).Rigorous case-matching was employed with respect to the time between the first most recent upload dates.The index date was defined as the date that the DHG user disabled their high-glucose alert.Glycemic control and number of initial high-glucose alerts were compared between the DHG and NDHG groups.The DHG group experienced a clear deterioration in percent time in range (%TIR) in the days leading up to the index date and a striking decrease in %TIR on the index date before recovering to a new, slightly lower steady state (Figure 1a).Average percent time above range (%TAR) and mean glucose followed a similar, but inverted, pattern (Figure 1b and c).Interestingly, aside from a few days before the index date, 1140115D STXXX10.
Key concepts: Continuous glucose monitoring, Glycemic, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Medicine, Hypoglycemia, Diabetes mellitus, Computer science, Endocrinology