2022Unpublished venueRequires access

Cryptocurrencies and fiat money: The end of a public good?

Stavros Kourmpetis, Alexandros Gazis

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Quiggin quoted that “Everyone, except an economist, knows what ‘money’ means, and even an economist can describe it in the course of a chapter or so”. In this paper we consider money a public good. Specifically, by money as a public good, it is clear a) that money is strictly considered as a resource, b) it serves the common good and c) the rules for the monetary system are set up in a democratic manner. Today - or maybe until the rise of FinTech- the State's money, a legal monopoly is the dominant form of money, public money. FinTech introduces blockchain digital currencies and possibly bringing private money and old ideas back to the economic sphere. In this article we outline the pros and cons of cryptocurrency and fiat currency, and we are trying to map while setting future arguments of their possible relationship/coexistence in the monetary systems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Quiggin quoted that “Everyone, except an economist, knows what ‘money’ means, and even an economist can describe it in the course of a chapter or so”. In this paper we consider money a public good. Specifically, by money as a public good, it is clear a) that money is strictly considered as a resource, b) it serves the common good and c) the rules for the monetary system are set up in a democratic manner. Today - or maybe until the rise of FinTech- the State's money, a legal monopoly is the dominant form of money, public money. FinTech introduces blockchain digital currencies and possibly bringing private money and old ideas back to the economic sphere. In this article we outline the pros and cons of cryptocurrency and fiat currency, and we are trying to map while setting future arguments of their possible relationship/coexistence in the monetary systems.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Quiggin quoted that “Everyone, except an economist, knows what ‘money’ means, and even an economist can describe it in the course of a chapter or so”. In this paper we consider money a public good. Specifically, by money as a public good, it is clear a) that money is strictly considered as a resource, b) it serves the common good and c) the rules for the monetary system are set up in a democratic manner. Today - or maybe until the rise of FinTech- the State's money, a legal monopoly is the dominant form of money, public money. FinTech introduces blockchain digital currencies and possibly bringing private money and old ideas back to the economic sphere. In this article we outline the pros and cons of cryptocurrency and fiat currency, and we are trying to map while setting future arguments of their possible relationship/coexistence in the monetary systems.

Key concepts: Fiat money, Cryptocurrency, Monetary economics, Economics, Computer science, Monetary policy, Computer security

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cryptocurrencies and fiat money: The end of a public good? — Research Paper | ScholarLens