2022Critical Philosophy of RaceRequires access

Crossed Lines in the Racialization Process

Robert Bernasconi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Race is often discussed as though it were tied to a rigid racial essentialism, but, for long periods of time, race has functioned predominantly as a border concept. That is to say, it has served as a dynamic fluid concept whose core lies not at the center but at its edges—hence the focus throughout much of modern racial thinking on policing the boundaries between the races where racial mixing has occurred. The focus falls especially on the legal, scientific, and philosophical discussions of racial classification in the United States, ranging from the definitions found in laws passed in Colonial Virginia at the turn of the eighteenth century through Virginia’s 1924 Act to Preserve Racial Integrity. Consideration is also given to the way in which the United States imposed its own rigid systems of classifications on Mexicans and Puerto Ricans.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Race is often discussed as though it were tied to a rigid racial essentialism, but, for long periods of time, race has functioned predominantly as a border concept. That is to say, it has served as a dynamic fluid concept whose core lies not at the center but at its edges—hence the focus throughout much of modern racial thinking on policing the boundaries between the races where racial mixing has occurred. The focus falls especially on the legal, scientific, and philosophical discussions of racial classification in the United States, ranging from the definitions found in laws passed in Colonial Virginia at the turn of the eighteenth century through Virginia’s 1924 Act to Preserve Racial Integrity. Consideration is also given to the way in which the United States imposed its own rigid systems of classifications on Mexicans and Puerto Ricans.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Race is often discussed as though it were tied to a rigid racial essentialism, but, for long periods of time, race has functioned predominantly as a border concept. That is to say, it has served as a dynamic fluid concept whose core lies not at the center but at its edges—hence the focus throughout much of modern racial thinking on policing the boundaries between the races where racial mixing has occurred. The focus falls especially on the legal, scientific, and philosophical discussions of racial classification in the United States, ranging from the definitions found in laws passed in Colonial Virginia at the turn of the eighteenth century through Virginia’s 1924 Act to Preserve Racial Integrity. Consideration is also given to the way in which the United States imposed its own rigid systems of classifications on Mexicans and Puerto Ricans.

Key concepts: Racialization, Race (biology), Essentialism, Racial formation theory, Colonialism, Focus (optics), Sociology, Gender studies

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Crossed Lines in the Racialization Process — Research Paper | ScholarLens