ScholarLens Back to search
2022•Research SquareOpen access

Methodological Rigour in Preclinical Urological Studies: a 14-year systematic review to increase research quality and value

Seung Hyun Park, Se Bee Lee, Seoyeon Park, Eun Young Kim, Damiano Pizzol, Mike Trott, Yvonne Barnett, Ai Koyanagi, Louis Jacob, Pınar Soysal, Nicola Veronese, Simona Ippoliti, Ramy Abou Ghayda, Nannan Thirumavalavan, Adonis Hijaz, David Sheyn, Rachel Pope, Britt Conroy, Amihay Nevo, Irina Jaeger, Shubham Gupta, Petre‐Cristian Ilie, Seung Won Lee, Dong Keon Yon, Hyun Ho Han, Sung Hwi Hong, Jae Il Shin, Lee Ponsky, Lee Smith

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This record does not include an abstract. Use the full-text link above if available.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An abstract is not available in the OpenAlex record for this paper.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Key concepts: Rigour, Value (mathematics), Quality (philosophy), Medical physics, Engineering ethics, Medicine, Computer science, Epistemology

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Methodological Rigour in Preclinical Urological Studies: a 14-year systematic review to increase research quality and value — Research Paper | ScholarLens