2022Unpublished venueOpen access

Civic Identity, Citizenship and Foreign Language Education

Liz Jackson

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Foreign language education is one important strategy among others for enhancing people’s identities as global citizens. Yet while cultivating a sense of global citizenship is often heralded as vital to meet local and global challenges faced around the world, the role of citizenship in this concept is not straightforward. Instead, citizenship plays a paradoxical role here, as citizenship often implies national boundaries, while global citizenship ideals intend to critically challenge or interrogate these same borders. This chapter explores the theoretical foundations for understanding global citizenship in literature on civic identity and citizenship and cosmopolitanism. It reveals that historically and today these concepts are fluid and contested. In relation, patriotism, nationalism, and what it means to be a good citizen are contentious. This makes these ideas difficult to use within the context of discussing and teaching for global citizenship. The implications for what it means to be a global citizen, in terms of attitudes and understandings, approaches and practices, is therefore not pregiven, but open to a range of interpretations. This chapter thus discusses the historical and philosophical roots of concepts underpinning major approaches to global citizenship today, exploring how they unfold into different visions of global citizenship education and foreign language education for global citizenship.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Foreign language education is one important strategy among others for enhancing people’s identities as global citizens. Yet while cultivating a sense of global citizenship is often heralded as vital to meet local and global challenges faced around the world, the role of citizenship in this concept is not straightforward. Instead, citizenship plays a paradoxical role here, as citizenship often implies national boundaries, while global citizenship ideals intend to critically challenge or interrogate these same borders. This chapter explores the theoretical foundations for understanding global citizenship in literature on civic identity and citizenship and cosmopolitanism. It reveals that historically and today these concepts are fluid and contested. In relation, patriotism, nationalism, and what it means to be a good citizen are contentious. This makes these ideas difficult to use within the context of discussing and teaching for global citizenship. The implications for what it means to be a global citizen, in terms of attitudes and understandings, approaches and practices, is therefore not pregiven, but open to a range of interpretations. This chapter thus discusses the historical and philosophical roots of concepts underpinning major approaches to global citizenship today, exploring how they unfold into different visions of global citizenship education and foreign language education for global citizenship.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Foreign language education is one important strategy among others for enhancing people’s identities as global citizens. Yet while cultivating a sense of global citizenship is often heralded as vital to meet local and global challenges faced around the world, the role of citizenship in this concept is not straightforward. Instead, citizenship plays a paradoxical role here, as citizenship often implies national boundaries, while global citizenship ideals intend to critically challenge or interrogate these same borders. This chapter explores the theoretical foundations for understanding global citizenship in literature on civic identity and citizenship and cosmopolitanism. It reveals that historically and today these concepts are fluid and contested. In relation, patriotism, nationalism, and what it means to be a good citizen are contentious. This makes these ideas difficult to use within the context of discussing and teaching for global citizenship. The implications for what it means to be a global citizen, in terms of attitudes and understandings, approaches and practices, is therefore not pregiven, but open to a range of interpretations. This chapter thus discusses the historical and philosophical roots of concepts underpinning major approaches to global citizenship today, exploring how they unfold into different visions of global citizenship education and foreign language education for global citizenship.

Key concepts: Citizenship, Identity (music), Political science, Citizenship education, Foreign language, Sociology, Gender studies, Pedagogy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Civic Identity, Citizenship and Foreign Language Education — Research Paper | ScholarLens