Health Effects of Vitamin D: Evidence from Mendelian Randomization studies v1
Aiping Fang
Abstract
Open-access reader
Aiping Fang
Abstract
Open-access reader
Preclinical data and observational studies suggest that vitamin D has wide-ranging skeletal and extra-skeletal effects. However, it remains controversial whether the link between vitamin D and many health outcomes is causal or not. Mendelian randomization (MR) provides an alternative approach to facilitate causal inference in an observational setting. Here, we will systematically summarize and evaluate the evidence on vitamin D and various health outcomes from MR studies.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Preclinical data and observational studies suggest that vitamin D has wide-ranging skeletal and extra-skeletal effects. However, it remains controversial whether the link between vitamin D and many health outcomes is causal or not. Mendelian randomization (MR) provides an alternative approach to facilitate causal inference in an observational setting. Here, we will systematically summarize and evaluate the evidence on vitamin D and various health outcomes from MR studies.
Key concepts: Mendelian randomization, Observational study, Causal inference, Vitamin D and neurology, Vitamin, Randomized controlled trial, Medicine, Psychology