Jury finds father guilty of injecting son with HIV.
Author information unavailable
Abstract
Author information unavailable
Abstract
[Name removed] was found guilty by a Missouri jury of injecting his son with HIV-tainted blood to avoid paying child support. [Name removed]'s first-degree assault conviction was based entirely on circumstantial evidence. The defense attorneys attempted to shift blame to a convicted child molester and to injection drug users who had visited the boy's home. However, all of them tested negative for HIV. The jury recommended a life sentence for [name removed].
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
[Name removed] was found guilty by a Missouri jury of injecting his son with HIV-tainted blood to avoid paying child support. [Name removed]'s first-degree assault conviction was based entirely on circumstantial evidence. The defense attorneys attempted to shift blame to a convicted child molester and to injection drug users who had visited the boy's home. However, all of them tested negative for HIV. The jury recommended a life sentence for [name removed].
Key concepts: Circumstantial evidence, Jury, Blame, Conviction, Life imprisonment, Sentence, Criminology, Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)