THE PURCHASING POWER PARITY HYPOTHESIS TESTED -ONCE AGAIN-. NEW EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR 28 OECD COUNTRIES
Fahd Boundi Chraki, Juan Pablo Mateo Tomé
Abstract
Open-access reader
Fahd Boundi Chraki, Juan Pablo Mateo Tomé
Abstract
Open-access reader
The present study is aimed to examine the validity of the purchasing power parity hypothesis for 28 OECD countries over the 1960q1-2021q4 period. To reach this goal, we apply three methods to evaluate whether the real exchange rates are stationary: the traditional unit root tests in time series, the panel unit root tests, and nonlinear unit root tests based on OLS and GLS detrending. The findings suggest that the purchasing power parity hypothesis does not hold even if the assessment considers nonlinear adjustment.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The present study is aimed to examine the validity of the purchasing power parity hypothesis for 28 OECD countries over the 1960q1-2021q4 period. To reach this goal, we apply three methods to evaluate whether the real exchange rates are stationary: the traditional unit root tests in time series, the panel unit root tests, and nonlinear unit root tests based on OLS and GLS detrending. The findings suggest that the purchasing power parity hypothesis does not hold even if the assessment considers nonlinear adjustment.
Key concepts: Purchasing power parity, Unit root, Econometrics, Economics, Unit root test, Relative purchasing power parity, Parity (physics), Exchange rate