2010EndodontologyRequires access

The influence of the smear layer on dentinal tubule penetration depth by different root canal sealers - An in vitro SEM study

Puneet Ajwani, Nalini Saini

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of smear layer on the penetration depth of three different root canal sealers into the dentinal tubules. Study Design: Fifty two recently extracted human single-rooted teeth (> 20 mm long) were selected. After chemomechanical preparation using K-files and 1% sodium hypochlorite solution, the samples were randomly divided into two equal groups: group A: smear layer remained intact; group B: complete removal of smear layer using 15% aqueous EDTA. Two teeth from each group were used as controls. Eight teeth from each group were obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha points and sealers Endoseal, Apexit, and AH-Plus, respectively. The penetration of sealers into the dentinal tubules was assessed using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Statistical analyses of the data were performed using one-way ANOVA test. Post-hoc comparisons by the Bonferroni test were used to determine whether the differences between the examined sealers were statistically significant. Results: Smear layer obstructed all the sealers from penetrating dentinal tubules. In contrast, smear layer removal allowed the penetration of all sealers to occur to a varying depth with Apexit and AH-Plus penetrating statistically significantly deeper than Endoseal. Conclusion: Smear layer plays an important role in sealer penetration into the dentinal tubules, as well as in the potential clinical implications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of smear layer on the penetration depth of three different root canal sealers into the dentinal tubules. Study Design: Fifty two recently extracted human single-rooted teeth (> 20 mm long) were selected. After chemomechanical preparation using K-files and 1% sodium hypochlorite solution, the samples were randomly divided into two equal groups: group A: smear layer remained intact; group B: complete removal of smear layer using 15% aqueous EDTA. Two teeth from each group were used as controls. Eight teeth from each group were obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha points and sealers Endoseal, Apexit, and AH-Plus, respectively. The penetration of sealers into the dentinal tubules was assessed using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Statistical analyses of the data were performed using one-way ANOVA test. Post-hoc comparisons by the Bonferroni test were used to determine whether the differences between the examined sealers were statistically significant. Results: Smear layer obstructed all the sealers from penetrating dentinal tubules. In contrast, smear layer removal allowed the penetration of all sealers to occur to a varying depth with Apexit and AH-Plus penetrating statistically significantly deeper than Endoseal. Conclusion: Smear layer plays an important role in sealer penetration into the dentinal tubules, as well as in the potential clinical implications.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of smear layer on the penetration depth of three different root canal sealers into the dentinal tubules. Study Design: Fifty two recently extracted human single-rooted teeth (> 20 mm long) were selected. After chemomechanical preparation using K-files and 1% sodium hypochlorite solution, the samples were randomly divided into two equal groups: group A: smear layer remained intact; group B: complete removal of smear layer using 15% aqueous EDTA. Two teeth from each group were used as controls. Eight teeth from each group were obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha points and sealers Endoseal, Apexit, and AH-Plus, respectively. The penetration of sealers into the dentinal tubules was assessed using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Statistical analyses of the data were performed using one-way ANOVA test. Post-hoc comparisons by the Bonferroni test were used to determine whether the differences between the examined sealers were statistically significant. Results: Smear layer obstructed all the sealers from penetrating dentinal tubules. In contrast, smear layer removal allowed the penetration of all sealers to occur to a varying depth with Apexit and AH-Plus penetrating statistically significantly deeper than Endoseal. Conclusion: Smear layer plays an important role in sealer penetration into the dentinal tubules, as well as in the potential clinical implications.

Key concepts: Smear layer, Dentinal Tubule, Dentistry, Penetration (warfare), Sodium hypochlorite, Root canal, Dentin, Scanning electron microscope

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The influence of the smear layer on dentinal tubule penetration depth by different root canal sealers - An in vitro SEM study — Research Paper | ScholarLens