2014arXiv (Cornell University)Open access

Implicit and explicit renormalization: two complementary views of\n effective interactions

E. Ruiz Arriola, S. Szpigel, V. S. Timóteo

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

We analyze quantitatively the interplay between explicit and implicit\nrenormalization in Nuclear Physics. By explicit renormalization we mean to\nintegrate out higher energy modes below a given cutoff scale using the\nsimilarity renormalization group (SRG) with a block-diagonal evolution\ngenerator, which separates the total Hilbert-space into a model space and its\ncomplementary. In the implicit renormalization we impose given conditions at\nlow energies for a cutoff theory. In both cases we compare the outcoming\neffective interactions as functions of the cutoff scale. We carry out a\ncomprehensive analysis of a toy-model which captures the main features of the\nnucleon-nucleon (NN) S-wave interaction at low energies. We find a wide energy\nregion where both approaches overlap. This amounts to a great simplification in\nthe determination of the effective interaction. Actually, the outcoming scales\nare within the expected ones relevant for the physics of light nuclei.\n

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We analyze quantitatively the interplay between explicit and implicit\nrenormalization in Nuclear Physics. By explicit renormalization we mean to\nintegrate out higher energy modes below a given cutoff scale using the\nsimilarity renormalization group (SRG) with a block-diagonal evolution\ngenerator, which separates the total Hilbert-space into a model space and its\ncomplementary. In the implicit renormalization we impose given conditions at\nlow energies for a cutoff theory. In both cases we compare the outcoming\neffective interactions as functions of the cutoff scale. We carry out a\ncomprehensive analysis of a toy-model which captures the main features of the\nnucleon-nucleon (NN) S-wave interaction at low energies. We find a wide energy\nregion where both approaches overlap. This amounts to a great simplification in\nthe determination of the effective interaction. Actually, the outcoming scales\nare within the expected ones relevant for the physics of light nuclei.\n

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We analyze quantitatively the interplay between explicit and implicit\nrenormalization in Nuclear Physics. By explicit renormalization we mean to\nintegrate out higher energy modes below a given cutoff scale using the\nsimilarity renormalization group (SRG) with a block-diagonal evolution\ngenerator, which separates the total Hilbert-space into a model space and its\ncomplementary. In the implicit renormalization we impose given conditions at\nlow energies for a cutoff theory. In both cases we compare the outcoming\neffective interactions as functions of the cutoff scale. We carry out a\ncomprehensive analysis of a toy-model which captures the main features of the\nnucleon-nucleon (NN) S-wave interaction at low energies. We find a wide energy\nregion where both approaches overlap. This amounts to a great simplification in\nthe determination of the effective interaction. Actually, the outcoming scales\nare within the expected ones relevant for the physics of light nuclei.\n

Key concepts: Cutoff, Renormalization, Physics, Renormalization group, Space (punctuation), Functional renormalization group, Scale (ratio), Statistical physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Implicit and explicit renormalization: two complementary views of\n effective interactions — Research Paper | ScholarLens