2003Journal of Medicine and Life ScienceOpen access

The Usefulness of Sural/Radial Amplitude Ratio in the Diagnosis of Mild Axonal Polyneuropathy

Sa‐Yoon Kang, Jihoon Kang

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Backgrounds and objectives: In the length-dependent axonal polyneuropathy, the distal part of the longer axons are affected earlier. In cases of mild axonal polyneuropathy, nerve conduction studies are frequently normal. We theorized that a sural/radial amplitude ratio (SRAR) might be a sensitive indicator of mild polyneuropathy. We investigated whether the SRAR may be a more sensitive indicator than sural amplitude alone in the diagnosis of mild axonal polyneuropathy.Methods: We analyzed medical records and electrophysiological studies of 32 patients with mild axonal polyneuropathy and 30 normal subjects. Sural amplitudes and SRAR in patients with signs of mild axonal polyneuropathy were compared to those of normal, age-matched control subjects. Sural and radial sensory amplitudes were measured in a standard method in all subjects.Results: Thirty five patients had an average SRAR of 0.26 as compared to 0.65 for the normal subjects. An SRAR of less than 0.50 was a strong predictor of axonal polyneuropathy, with the balance of sensitivity and specificity (80%), as compared to an absolute sural amplitude, which had sensitivity of only 57%. The SRAR did not vary significantly with age.Conclusion: We conclude that the SRAR is a useful electrodiagnostic test for mild axonal polyneuropathy.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Backgrounds and objectives: In the length-dependent axonal polyneuropathy, the distal part of the longer axons are affected earlier. In cases of mild axonal polyneuropathy, nerve conduction studies are frequently normal. We theorized that a sural/radial amplitude ratio (SRAR) might be a sensitive indicator of mild polyneuropathy. We investigated whether the SRAR may be a more sensitive indicator than sural amplitude alone in the diagnosis of mild axonal polyneuropathy.Methods: We analyzed medical records and electrophysiological studies of 32 patients with mild axonal polyneuropathy and 30 normal subjects. Sural amplitudes and SRAR in patients with signs of mild axonal polyneuropathy were compared to those of normal, age-matched control subjects. Sural and radial sensory amplitudes were measured in a standard method in all subjects.Results: Thirty five patients had an average SRAR of 0.26 as compared to 0.65 for the normal subjects. An SRAR of less than 0.50 was a strong predictor of axonal polyneuropathy, with the balance of sensitivity and specificity (80%), as compared to an absolute sural amplitude, which had sensitivity of only 57%. The SRAR did not vary significantly with age.Conclusion: We conclude that the SRAR is a useful electrodiagnostic test for mild axonal polyneuropathy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Backgrounds and objectives: In the length-dependent axonal polyneuropathy, the distal part of the longer axons are affected earlier. In cases of mild axonal polyneuropathy, nerve conduction studies are frequently normal. We theorized that a sural/radial amplitude ratio (SRAR) might be a sensitive indicator of mild polyneuropathy. We investigated whether the SRAR may be a more sensitive indicator than sural amplitude alone in the diagnosis of mild axonal polyneuropathy.Methods: We analyzed medical records and electrophysiological studies of 32 patients with mild axonal polyneuropathy and 30 normal subjects. Sural amplitudes and SRAR in patients with signs of mild axonal polyneuropathy were compared to those of normal, age-matched control subjects. Sural and radial sensory amplitudes were measured in a standard method in all subjects.Results: Thirty five patients had an average SRAR of 0.26 as compared to 0.65 for the normal subjects. An SRAR of less than 0.50 was a strong predictor of axonal polyneuropathy, with the balance of sensitivity and specificity (80%), as compared to an absolute sural amplitude, which had sensitivity of only 57%. The SRAR did not vary significantly with age.Conclusion: We conclude that the SRAR is a useful electrodiagnostic test for mild axonal polyneuropathy.

Key concepts: Polyneuropathy, Sural nerve, Medicine, Electrophysiology, Nerve conduction velocity, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Anatomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Usefulness of Sural/Radial Amplitude Ratio in the Diagnosis of Mild Axonal Polyneuropathy — Research Paper | ScholarLens