TWO TYPES OF EXTERNAL CAUSES AND AN IMPLICATION FOR CAUSATIVE ALTERNATION
Masaki Yasuhara
Abstract
Open-access reader
Masaki Yasuhara
Abstract
Open-access reader
This paper investigates the (un)availability of the causative alternation in cutting verbs (e.g. cut) and cooking verbs (e.g. bake) from the viewpoint of the external causes these verbs lexicalize; that is, these types of verbs lexicalize causal meanings; cut implies the use of a sharp object and bake implies the use of an oven or heat. Verbs that denote externally caused events generally resist the causative alternation in English; for example, cutting verbs do not have an anti-causative variant. Cooking verbs, however, can alternate. This contrast is examined in terms of inferred lexicalization.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper investigates the (un)availability of the causative alternation in cutting verbs (e.g. cut) and cooking verbs (e.g. bake) from the viewpoint of the external causes these verbs lexicalize; that is, these types of verbs lexicalize causal meanings; cut implies the use of a sharp object and bake implies the use of an oven or heat. Verbs that denote externally caused events generally resist the causative alternation in English; for example, cutting verbs do not have an anti-causative variant. Cooking verbs, however, can alternate. This contrast is examined in terms of inferred lexicalization.
Key concepts: Alternation (linguistics), Causative, Lexicalization, Linguistics, Verb, Contrast (vision), Mathematics, Object (grammar)