2018ENGLISH LINGUISTICSOpen access

TWO TYPES OF EXTERNAL CAUSES AND AN IMPLICATION FOR CAUSATIVE ALTERNATION

Masaki Yasuhara

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This paper investigates the (un)availability of the causative alternation in cutting verbs (e.g. cut) and cooking verbs (e.g. bake) from the viewpoint of the external causes these verbs lexicalize; that is, these types of verbs lexicalize causal meanings; cut implies the use of a sharp object and bake implies the use of an oven or heat. Verbs that denote externally caused events generally resist the causative alternation in English; for example, cutting verbs do not have an anti-causative variant. Cooking verbs, however, can alternate. This contrast is examined in terms of inferred lexicalization.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper investigates the (un)availability of the causative alternation in cutting verbs (e.g. cut) and cooking verbs (e.g. bake) from the viewpoint of the external causes these verbs lexicalize; that is, these types of verbs lexicalize causal meanings; cut implies the use of a sharp object and bake implies the use of an oven or heat. Verbs that denote externally caused events generally resist the causative alternation in English; for example, cutting verbs do not have an anti-causative variant. Cooking verbs, however, can alternate. This contrast is examined in terms of inferred lexicalization.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper investigates the (un)availability of the causative alternation in cutting verbs (e.g. cut) and cooking verbs (e.g. bake) from the viewpoint of the external causes these verbs lexicalize; that is, these types of verbs lexicalize causal meanings; cut implies the use of a sharp object and bake implies the use of an oven or heat. Verbs that denote externally caused events generally resist the causative alternation in English; for example, cutting verbs do not have an anti-causative variant. Cooking verbs, however, can alternate. This contrast is examined in terms of inferred lexicalization.

Key concepts: Alternation (linguistics), Causative, Lexicalization, Linguistics, Verb, Contrast (vision), Mathematics, Object (grammar)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
TWO TYPES OF EXTERNAL CAUSES AND AN IMPLICATION FOR CAUSATIVE ALTERNATION — Research Paper | ScholarLens