2011The Indian Journal of Agricultural SciencesOpen access

Performance of basmati rice (Oryza sativa)-based cropping systems under different modes of nutrient management

Rajnish Kumar Singh, Subhash Chandra

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

Field experiments were carried out during 2006–08 to study the response of basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.)-based cropping systems to different modes of nutrient management. The system productivity was the highest with basmati rice–vegetable pea (Pisum sativum L.) (4.40 tonnes/ha) during 2006–07 and basmati rice–wheat (Tritcum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.) (4.36 tonnes/ha) during 2007–08. These two cropping systems were significantly better than the basmati rice–lentil (Lens esculenta M.) and basmati rice–Brassica napus during each year of study. Comparison of different nutrient management showed that the grain yield of rice with inorganic nutrient management was significantly highest (3.55 tonnes/ha) in 2006–07, while in 2007–08 it was at par with organic nutrient management, the system productivity in terms of rice equivalent yield was also 37.0 and 5.0% higher with inorganic nutrient management over the organic nutrient management in 2006–07 and 2007–08, respectively. Soil organic carbon was 13.0% higher with organic nutrient management (0.907%) than the inorganic nutrient management (0.803%). Available potassium was also significantly higher with organic nutrient management after harvest of winter (rabi) season crops. However, available nitrogen and phosphorus were recorded significantly higher with integrated nutrient management at harvest of both rice and rabi crops. The available sulphur remained the highest with inorganic nutrient management during both the seasons. Improvement in soil organic carbon, available N, P, K and S was higher under basmati rice–lentil cropping system during the both seasons.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Field experiments were carried out during 2006–08 to study the response of basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.)-based cropping systems to different modes of nutrient management. The system productivity was the highest with basmati rice–vegetable pea (Pisum sativum L.) (4.40 tonnes/ha) during 2006–07 and basmati rice–wheat (Tritcum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.) (4.36 tonnes/ha) during 2007–08. These two cropping systems were significantly better than the basmati rice–lentil (Lens esculenta M.) and basmati rice–Brassica napus during each year of study. Comparison of different nutrient management showed that the grain yield of rice with inorganic nutrient management was significantly highest (3.55 tonnes/ha) in 2006–07, while in 2007–08 it was at par with organic nutrient management, the system productivity in terms of rice equivalent yield was also 37.0 and 5.0% higher with inorganic nutrient management over the organic nutrient management in 2006–07 and 2007–08, respectively. Soil organic carbon was 13.0% higher with organic nutrient management (0.907%) than the inorganic nutrient management (0.803%). Available potassium was also significantly higher with organic nutrient management after harvest of winter (rabi) season crops. However, available nitrogen and phosphorus were recorded significantly higher with integrated nutrient management at harvest of both rice and rabi crops. The available sulphur remained the highest with inorganic nutrient management during both the seasons. Improvement in soil organic carbon, available N, P, K and S was higher under basmati rice–lentil cropping system during the both seasons.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Field experiments were carried out during 2006–08 to study the response of basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.)-based cropping systems to different modes of nutrient management. The system productivity was the highest with basmati rice–vegetable pea (Pisum sativum L.) (4.40 tonnes/ha) during 2006–07 and basmati rice–wheat (Tritcum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.) (4.36 tonnes/ha) during 2007–08. These two cropping systems were significantly better than the basmati rice–lentil (Lens esculenta M.) and basmati rice–Brassica napus during each year of study. Comparison of different nutrient management showed that the grain yield of rice with inorganic nutrient management was significantly highest (3.55 tonnes/ha) in 2006–07, while in 2007–08 it was at par with organic nutrient management, the system productivity in terms of rice equivalent yield was also 37.0 and 5.0% higher with inorganic nutrient management over the organic nutrient management in 2006–07 and 2007–08, respectively. Soil organic carbon was 13.0% higher with organic nutrient management (0.907%) than the inorganic nutrient management (0.803%). Available potassium was also significantly higher with organic nutrient management after harvest of winter (rabi) season crops. However, available nitrogen and phosphorus were recorded significantly higher with integrated nutrient management at harvest of both rice and rabi crops. The available sulphur remained the highest with inorganic nutrient management during both the seasons. Improvement in soil organic carbon, available N, P, K and S was higher under basmati rice–lentil cropping system during the both seasons.

Key concepts: Nutrient management, Agronomy, Nutrient, Oryza sativa, Cropping system, Phosphorus, Biology, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance of basmati rice (Oryza sativa)-based cropping systems under different modes of nutrient management — Research Paper | ScholarLens