1992PEDIATRICSRequires access

Meconium Aspiration Syndrome (MAS)

GUNNAR WAAGE

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

To the Editor.— In the article "Intratracheal Suctioning, Systemic Infection, and the Meconium Aspiration Syndrome," Wiswell and Henley review their experience with meconium-stained babies from 1985 to 1989. Dr Wiswell compares two groups of neonates, those intubated and those not intubated. The rationale for not intubating neonates included (1) the lack of meconium in the hypopharynx, (2) the apparent vigor of the child, and (3) thin-consistency meconium. The literature agrees that the majority of meconium-stained neonates fall into such a category; however, Dr Wiswell finds only 19% of neonates in this category.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To the Editor.— In the article "Intratracheal Suctioning, Systemic Infection, and the Meconium Aspiration Syndrome," Wiswell and Henley review their experience with meconium-stained babies from 1985 to 1989. Dr Wiswell compares two groups of neonates, those intubated and those not intubated. The rationale for not intubating neonates included (1) the lack of meconium in the hypopharynx, (2) the apparent vigor of the child, and (3) thin-consistency meconium. The literature agrees that the majority of meconium-stained neonates fall into such a category; however, Dr Wiswell finds only 19% of neonates in this category.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To the Editor.— In the article "Intratracheal Suctioning, Systemic Infection, and the Meconium Aspiration Syndrome," Wiswell and Henley review their experience with meconium-stained babies from 1985 to 1989. Dr Wiswell compares two groups of neonates, those intubated and those not intubated. The rationale for not intubating neonates included (1) the lack of meconium in the hypopharynx, (2) the apparent vigor of the child, and (3) thin-consistency meconium. The literature agrees that the majority of meconium-stained neonates fall into such a category; however, Dr Wiswell finds only 19% of neonates in this category.

Key concepts: Medicine, Meconium, Meconium aspiration syndrome, Pediatrics, Obstetrics, Pregnancy, Fetus, Genetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome (MAS) — Research Paper | ScholarLens