Meconium Aspiration Syndrome (MAS)
GUNNAR WAAGE
Abstract
GUNNAR WAAGE
Abstract
To the Editor.— In the article "Intratracheal Suctioning, Systemic Infection, and the Meconium Aspiration Syndrome," Wiswell and Henley review their experience with meconium-stained babies from 1985 to 1989. Dr Wiswell compares two groups of neonates, those intubated and those not intubated. The rationale for not intubating neonates included (1) the lack of meconium in the hypopharynx, (2) the apparent vigor of the child, and (3) thin-consistency meconium. The literature agrees that the majority of meconium-stained neonates fall into such a category; however, Dr Wiswell finds only 19% of neonates in this category.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
To the Editor.— In the article "Intratracheal Suctioning, Systemic Infection, and the Meconium Aspiration Syndrome," Wiswell and Henley review their experience with meconium-stained babies from 1985 to 1989. Dr Wiswell compares two groups of neonates, those intubated and those not intubated. The rationale for not intubating neonates included (1) the lack of meconium in the hypopharynx, (2) the apparent vigor of the child, and (3) thin-consistency meconium. The literature agrees that the majority of meconium-stained neonates fall into such a category; however, Dr Wiswell finds only 19% of neonates in this category.
Key concepts: Medicine, Meconium, Meconium aspiration syndrome, Pediatrics, Obstetrics, Pregnancy, Fetus, Genetics